Vocabulary Insertion (Distributed Morphology) #
@cite{halle-marantz-1993} @cite{bobaljik-2000}
Vocabulary Insertion is the mechanism by which syntactic terminal nodes receive phonological exponents in Distributed Morphology. It is the formal realization of DM's List 2: a set of Vocabulary Items (VI rules) that compete for insertion at each terminal.
Architecture #
A Vocabulary Item specifies:
- A phonological exponent (the surface form)
- A morphosyntactic context (the features the terminal must bear)
- A root context (optional: which roots the rule applies to)
When multiple VI rules match a terminal, the Elsewhere Condition (@cite{halle-marantz-1993}) resolves the competition: the most specific matching rule wins. A rule is more specific if its context is a proper superset of another matching rule's context.
Root-Out Insertion #
@cite{bobaljik-2000} argues that VI proceeds root-out: the root is inserted first, then inflectional affixes outward. This means VI for outer morphemes can only be phonologically conditioned by material already inserted (inward) — it cannot "look ahead" to morphemes not yet inserted. This is the basis for the claim that outward-sensitive phonologically conditioned suppletive allomorphy (OS-PCSA) should not exist.
Connection to Linglib #
This module provides the generic VI framework. Language-specific VI
rules live in Fragments/ or in phenomenon-specific Studies/ files.
The Categorizer and CategorizedRoot types from
Theories/Morphology/DM/Categorizer.lean provide the syntax-side
terminal nodes that VI targets.
A Vocabulary Item: a rule mapping morphosyntactic context to a phonological exponent.
Ctx: the type of morphosyntactic contexts (e.g., feature bundles)Root: the type of root identifiers (for root-specific rules)
The specificity field encodes the Elsewhere Condition: when
multiple rules match, the highest-specificity rule wins. In
practice, specificity equals the number of features the context
checks — a rule conditioned on [ACC, +animate] (specificity 2) beats
a default rule with no feature requirements (specificity 0).
- exponent : String
The phonological exponent inserted at the terminal.
- contextMatch : Ctx → Bool
Context check: does the terminal's feature bundle match?
Root restriction: which roots this rule applies to.
nonemeans the rule is unrestricted (default/elsewhere).- specificity : ℕ
Specificity for Elsewhere Condition resolution. Higher = more specific. When two rules both match, the higher-specificity rule wins.
Instances For
Does a Vocabulary Item match at a given terminal node? Checks both the morphosyntactic context and the root restriction.
Equations
Instances For
Insert a Vocabulary Item at a terminal node. Tries all rules in
specificity order (highest first); returns the exponent of the
first matching rule. Returns none if no rule matches.
This implements the Subset Principle / Elsewhere Condition (@cite{halle-marantz-1993}): among all matching rules, the most specific one wins.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Simplified insertion when rules are not root-specific.
Equations
- Morphology.DM.VI.vocabularyInsertSimple rules ctx = Morphology.DM.VI.vocabularyInsert rules ctx ()
Instances For
A rule set has a default (elsewhere) rule if some rule matches every context.
Equations
- Morphology.DM.VI.hasDefault rules = ∃ vi ∈ rules, ∀ (ctx : Ctx) (root : Root), vi.matches ctx root = true
Instances For
A rule overrides another: both match the same context, but the first has strictly higher specificity.
Equations
- Morphology.DM.VI.overrides vi₁ vi₂ ctx root = (vi₁.matches ctx root = true ∧ vi₂.matches ctx root = true ∧ vi₁.specificity > vi₂.specificity)
Instances For
Root-out ordering: a terminal at position i in the morphological
structure (0 = root, increasing outward) is inserted at step i.
@cite{bobaljik-2000} argues this is the standard assumption in DM: the root is the first exponent to be inserted, then the innermost inflectional affix, then the next one out, etc.
The consequence: VI for terminal at position i can only be
conditioned by the phonological shapes of terminals at positions
0..i−1 (already inserted). It cannot look ahead to position i+1.
- positions : ℕ
Number of terminal positions in the morphological word.
At each step, which position is being inserted. For root-out: step i inserts position i.
Instances For
A root-out insertion order: position 0 (root) first, then outward.
Equations
- Morphology.DM.VI.rootOutOrder n = { positions := n, order := id }
Instances For
The constraint that OS-PCSA imposes: the conditioning environment
for VI at position i can only include positions inward of i
(i.e., positions 0..i−1).
If the alternation at position i is conditioned by the phonological
shape of a morpheme at position i+1 or beyond, it is
outward-sensitive and problematic for standard root-out DM.
Equations
- Morphology.DM.VI.isInwardConditioned conditioningPos targetPos = decide (conditioningPos < targetPos)
Instances For
The Telugu weak alternation is outward-sensitive: the alternation on the n head (closer to root) is conditioned by case/agreement suffixes (further from root). This is the key diagnostic that motivates the phonological analysis.
Equations
- Morphology.DM.VI.isOutwardSensitive conditioningPos targetPos = decide (conditioningPos ≥ targetPos)
Instances For
Inward conditioning: position 0 can condition position 1.
Outward conditioning: position 2 cannot condition position 1 under root-out VI (it hasn't been inserted yet).