Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Morphology.DM.NominalStructure

Nominal Phrase Structure (Distributed Morphology) #

@cite{adamson-2024} @cite{myler-2016} @cite{kramer-2015}

Structural positions within the extended nominal projection, the Gender Locality Hypothesis (GLH), and the possession-type distinction.

These types encode general claims about nominal structure that are independent of any particular language:

The GLH was proposed by @cite{adamson-2024}; the inalienable/alienable structural distinction follows @cite{myler-2016} (following @cite{alexiadou-2003}, @cite{barker-1995}).

Structural positions within and around the nominal phrase.

@cite{adamson-2024} distinguishes positions by their locality to n, the locus of gender features:

[DP D [NumP Num [PossP DP_alienable Poss [nP DP_inalienable [n √ROOT n]]]]]

Only positions within nP are local enough to condition gender.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Gender Locality Hypothesis (GLH):

      "Gender features on n must be valued only within nP." (@cite{adamson-2024} (15))

      A position can influence gender assignment iff it is nP-internal. Elements introduced at Poss, Num, D, or higher cannot condition gender.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Two types of possession, distinguished by structural position (@cite{adamson-2024}, following @cite{myler-2016}).

        • Inalienable (iPossession): possessor introduced in Spec,nP. The n head bears a selectional feature {D} (CatHead.selectsD). Semantically introduces a body-part-of / part-whole relation.
        • Alienable (aPossession): possessor introduced in Spec,PossP, mediated by a Poss head. Requires additional morphological marking in many languages (e.g., Teop te).
        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Can this possession type affect gender assignment? Derived from the GLH and the possessor's structural position.

            Equations
            Instances For

              Number features can appear in two positions (@cite{adamson-2024} §5.1):

              • Low number (on n): derivational, can interact with gender. Evidence: Standard Italian -a plurals (masc.sg → fem.pl), Tunisian Arabic collectives (Dali & Mathieu 2021).
              • High number (on Num): inflectional, cannot interact with gender.
              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Functional heads outside nP whose features cannot affect gender assignment under the GLH (@cite{adamson-2024} §5.2).

                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Two mechanisms by which iPossession can affect gender (@cite{adamson-2024} §§2.3, 3–4):

                      1. Possessee gender: the noun's gender is determined by WHETHER it has an iPossessor. The n head that introduces an iPossessor bears particular gender features. (Teop, Jarawara)
                      2. Inherited gender: the noun's gender is determined by the GENDER OF the iPossessor. An unvalued gender probe on n is valued via Probe-Goal agreement with the iPossessor DP. (Yanyuwa, Coastal Marind)
                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Both mechanisms are consistent with the GLH: in both possessee gender (Teop, Jarawara) and inherited gender (Yanyuwa, Coastal Marind), the gender-affecting element is nP-internal.