Clitic vs. Affix Diagnostics #
@cite{zwicky-pullum-1983}
Six criteria for distinguishing clitics from inflectional affixes, formalized as a diagnostic profile.
The six criteria #
| Criterion | Clitic-like | Affix-like |
|---|---|---|
| A. Selection | low (any category) | high (specific stems) |
| B. Paradigm gaps | none | present |
| C. Morphophonological idiosyncrasies | none | present |
| D. Semantic idiosyncrasies | none | present |
| E. Syntactic rules affect combination | no | yes |
| F. Attaches to cliticized material | yes | no |
A morpheme that scores affix-like on all six criteria is an inflectional affix. A morpheme that scores clitic-like on all six is a simple clitic. The surprising result of @cite{zwicky-pullum-1983} is that English -n't scores affix-like on all six, despite the traditional clitic analysis.
A diagnostic profile scoring a bound morpheme on Zwicky & Pullum's six criteria. Each field records the empirical observation for one criterion; the classification into clitic vs. affix is derived from the profile, not stipulated.
- morpheme : String
Name of the morpheme being diagnosed.
- selection : Core.Morphology.SelectionDegree
A. Degree of selection: how restrictive is the morpheme about what it attaches to? Clitics: low. Affixes: singleCategory or closedClass.
- hasArbitraryGaps : Bool
B. Are there arbitrary gaps in the paradigm? Characteristic of affixes (e.g., *strided, *amn't).
- hasMorphophonIdiosyncrasies : Bool
C. Does the combination show morphophonological idiosyncrasies (irregular allomorphy, suppletion)? Characteristic of affixes (e.g., won't ← will + n't).
- hasSemanticIdiosyncrasies : Bool
D. Does the combination show semantic idiosyncrasies (meaning not derivable from parts)? Characteristic of affixes (e.g., mustn't = MUST(NOT(P)), not NOT(MUST(P))).
- syntacticRulesApply : Bool
E. Do syntactic rules (e.g., Subject–Auxiliary Inversion) treat the combination as a unit? If yes, the morpheme behaves like part of the word (affix-like), not a separate clitic.
- attachesToCliticizedMaterial : Bool
F. Can the morpheme attach to material that already contains a (simple) clitic? Clitics can stack (I'd've); affixes cannot (*I'd'ven't).
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Morphology.Diagnostics.instBEqCliticAffixProfile.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Does this profile indicate affix-like behavior on criterion A?
Equations
Instances For
Count how many criteria score affix-like.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Classify a morpheme based on its diagnostic profile.
A morpheme that scores affix-like on all six criteria is classified as an inflectional affix. A morpheme scoring clitic-like on all six is a simple clitic. Mixed profiles are classified as special clitics (following @cite{zwicky-pullum-1983}'s taxonomy).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Does this morpheme satisfy all six criteria for inflectional affix?
Equations
- p.isUnambiguousAffix = (p.affixScore == 6)
Instances For
Does this morpheme satisfy all six criteria for simple clitic?
Equations
- p.isUnambiguousClitic = (p.cliticScore == 6)
Instances For
A morpheme scoring 6/6 affix-like classifies as inflAffix.
A morpheme scoring 0/6 affix-like classifies as simpleClitic.
Classification is exhaustive: every profile maps to a MorphStatus.