Documentation

Linglib.Theories.Interfaces.SyntaxSemantics.Minimalism.TopologicalMapping

The Topological Mapping Theory #

@cite{longobardi-2005} @cite{longobardi-1994}

@cite{longobardi-2005} §9: a mapping theory from nominal syntactic forms to logically oriented representations. The theory rests on two axioms and a licensing condition, from which the Core Generalization — reference (to individuals) iff N-to-D — follows as a theorem.

Axioms #

Derived Theorems #

Noun Taxonomy #

Four classes of nominal heads, ranked by three diagnostic tests: object-referentiality, predicative restrictions, and kind-referentiality.

The four classes of nominal heads, ranked from most prototypically referential (pronouns) to least (common nouns).

@cite{longobardi-2005} table (28): these four classes are distinguished by three tests — object-referentiality (in D), predicative restrictions (not in D), and kind-referentiality (with definite article).

  • pronoun : NominalHeadClass

    Always in D in all argument environments. Object-referential only. Cannot function predicatively or as kind-denoting expressions.

  • properName : NominalHeadClass

    Raise to D obligatorily in argument function (Romance). Object-referential. Predicative use conditioned. No kind reading.

  • specialCommon : NominalHeadClass

    Raise to D only under special conditions (genitive modifier, deictic context). Object-referential when raised. Full predicative use. Kind-referential with definite article. Examples: casa 'home', mamma 'mom', lunedì 'Monday'.

  • commonNoun : NominalHeadClass

    Never raise to D. Never object-referential. Full predicative use. Kind-referential with definite article.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      The scalar hierarchy of properness from @cite{longobardi-2005} (25).

      Nominal expressions are ranked along a scale from most prototypically proper-like to most common-like. Access to the N-to-D derivational strategy decreases monotonically along this scale.

      a. Pronouns: always in D. b. Names of persons, geographical units: raise whenever D is empty. c. Names of days: raise only under particular semantic conditions. d. Casa, kinship terms: raise only if followed by genitive modifier. e. Normal common nouns: never raise.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Raising access decreases monotonically with properness rank: if class c₁ is more proper than c₂, then c₁'s raising is at least as obligatory as c₂'s.

        The lexical type of a noun: whether it names objects or kinds.

        @cite{longobardi-2005} §4: nouns lexically divide into object-naming (proper names, pronouns — intrinsically referential) and kind-naming (common nouns — denote kinds, not individuals).

        • objectNaming : LexicalNamingType

          Object-naming: learning the name means learning to apply it to a particular object. Proper names, pronouns.

        • kindNaming : LexicalNamingType

          Kind-naming: learning the name means learning to recognize a potentially open set of objects. Common nouns.

        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            A nominal argument configuration, capturing the syntactic and semantic state of a DP in argument position.

            • namingType : LexicalNamingType

              The head noun's lexical naming type

            • dHasReferentialContent : Bool

              Does D contain a lexically referential expression? (either an overt determiner/quantifier, or N raised to D, or an expletive article linked to a raised N in a CHAIN)

            • isArgument : Bool

              Is the nominal in argument function?

            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  (52) Denotation Hypothesis: Individuals are denoted in D.

                  The D position is the locus of referential interpretation. A nominal denotes an individual (object or kind) iff its D position is associated with referential content.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    (53) Licensing Condition: Arguments denote individuals.

                    Full Interpretation requires arguments to have a referential value (whether constant or variable).

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      (54a) A constant: a fixed referential value denoting one and only one entity (kind or object). Requires D to contain (or CHAIN-link to) a lexically referential expression — either a raised N, an overt determiner, or a pronoun base-generated in D.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        (54b) A variable: bound by an operator (existential, generic, or the variable-binding force of a lexical determiner) and ranging over a set of entities. Arises when D is empty (no referential content).

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          (55) Arguments with empty D are variables.

                          From (52)+(53)+(54): if D is empty, then by (52) the nominal cannot denote an individual via D. By (53) it must still denote (being an argument). By (54b) the only remaining option is variable interpretation.

                          (56) An argument is a constant only if D contains a lexically referential expression.

                          Equivalently: constant interpretation requires N-to-D (for proper names), an overt determiner, or a pronoun in D.

                          (33) The Core Generalization: Reference (to individuals) iff N-to-D.

                          This is the paper's central result, unifying object reference and kind reference. A nominal refers to an individual (constant interpretation) if and only if D has referential content (achieved by N-to-D raising for proper names, by an overt determiner for common nouns, or by base-generation for pronouns).

                          (41) A nominal is an argument only if introduced by D.

                          @cite{longobardi-2005} §7: this principle, from @cite{szabolcsi-1987} and @cite{stowell-1989-1991}, is derived from (52)+(53). In non-argument environments (predicates, vocatives, exclamations), nominals can occur without D.

                          @cite{longobardi-2005} §10, question (57c): Why must proper names raise?

                          Object-naming nouns cannot satisfy (54b) — they name objects, not kinds, so they cannot enter the interpretive formula Dx.x ∈ kind(N) that gives variables their meaning. Their only route to argumenthood is constant interpretation via (54a), which requires D content. Since proper names are bare (no overt determiner), they must raise N-to-D to fill D.

                          @cite{longobardi-2005} §10, question (57a): Why do common nouns not have to raise?

                          Kind-naming nouns can satisfy (54b): they name kinds, so they can enter the formula Dx.x ∈ kind(N) as the restrictor of a variable. Empty D yields a variable bound by an existential or generic operator. No raising is needed for convergence.

                          Whether a definite article is expletive (semantically vacuous placeholder) or a genuine semantic operator.

                          @cite{longobardi-2005} §8: when a proper name appears with a definite article (la Maria, il Gianni), the article is expletive — it does not contribute uniqueness or familiarity semantics. It merely fills the D position that N-raising would otherwise occupy.

                          • expletive : ArticleType

                            Expletive: phonological placeholder for D, no semantic content. Forms a CHAIN with the noun. la MariaMaria raised to D.

                          • operator : ArticleType

                            Semantic operator: contributes uniqueness (ι), familiarity, or quantificational force. il tavolo 'the table' — real definite.

                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              An expletive article does not induce kind readings.

                              @cite{longobardi-2005} (46)–(47): la Maria behaves identically to bare Maria — wide scope, rigid, no generic/kind reading. This distinguishes expletive articles from genuine definite operators, which CAN induce kind readings (i cani 'the dogs' = the dog-kind).

                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                Proper names in D are directly referential.

                                Bridge connecting the syntactic analysis (N-to-D raising creates constant interpretation) to the semantic analysis (proper names have constant character and rigid content). The two perspectives converge: syntactically, D is the locus of reference; semantically, proper names are rigid designators.