Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.WordOrder.Typology

Word-Order Typology (@cite{dryer-haspelmath-2013} / WALS) #

@cite{dryer-1992} @cite{dryer-haspelmath-2013} @cite{gibson-2025} @cite{greenberg-1963}

WALS data from @cite{gibson-2025}: cross-linguistic counts of harmonic vs disharmonic word-order pairings. @cite{dryer-1992} documents that languages overwhelmingly prefer consistent head direction across construction types (the head-direction generalization, @cite{greenberg-1963}).

Data #

Three cross-tabulations from WALS:

Each table is a 2×2 contingency table: VO/OV × head-initial/head-final for the second construction. Harmonic cells (both HI or both HF) dominate.

Single-Word Exceptions (Table 4) #

Some constructions show disharmonic tendencies cross-linguistically: adjective-noun, demonstrative-noun, intensifier-adjective, negator-verb. @cite{gibson-2025} argues these are cases where the dependent is a single word (no recursive subtree), so head direction is irrelevant to DLM.

A single cell in a 2×2 alignment table. dir1 is the direction for the first construction (verb-object order), dir2 is the direction for the second construction.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For
        Equations
        Instances For

          Whether an alignment cell represents a harmonic (consistent-direction) pair.

          Equations
          Instances For

            A 2×2 cross-tabulation of two construction types.

            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Total count of harmonic (diagonal) cells.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Total count of disharmonic (off-diagonal) cells.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Total number of languages in the table.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      Whether harmonic pairings are the majority.

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        Table 1: Verb-Object order × Adposition order (@cite{dryer-haspelmath-2013}, WALS). @cite{gibson-2025} Table 1. 981 languages.

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Table 2: Verb-Object order × Subordinator order (@cite{dryer-haspelmath-2013}, WALS). @cite{gibson-2025} Table 2. 456 languages.

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            Table 3: Verb-Object order × Relative clause order (@cite{dryer-haspelmath-2013}, WALS). @cite{gibson-2025} Table 3. 665 languages.

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              The head-direction generalization: across all three construction pairs, harmonic word-order pairings dominate.

                              This is the core empirical observation that @cite{gibson-2025} argues DLM explains: consistent head direction keeps recursive spine dependencies local.

                              Disharmonic cells have mismatched directions.

                              Construction types where disharmonic order is common (Gibson Table 4).

                              These are cases where the dependent is typically a single word (no recursive subtree), so head direction doesn't affect DLM. Gibson's argument: DLM only cares about direction when subtrees intervene between head and dependent.

                              Data here is qualitative — WALS counts not provided in Gibson for these. Marked as data TBD for future WALS lookup.

                              Instances For
                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  All single-word exceptions from Gibson Table 4.

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    WALS Ch 81: The six-way classification of basic constituent order.

                                    The "basic" order is determined by the dominant order in pragmatically neutral, declarative clauses with full NP arguments. Languages where no single order clearly dominates (e.g., free word-order languages like Warlpiri, or V2 languages like German where underlying order is debated) are classified as "no dominant order."

                                    Key finding: SOV and SVO together account for >76% of languages; object-initial orders (OVS + OSV) are vanishingly rare. This asymmetry is one of the most robust typological generalizations: subjects overwhelmingly precede objects.

                                    Instances For
                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        WALS Ch 82: Binary classification of S-V order.

                                        Instances For
                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For

                                            WALS Ch 83: Binary classification of O-V order.

                                            The most theoretically significant binary parameter: whether the object precedes the verb (OV = head-final VP) or follows it (VO = head-initial VP). This single parameter correlates with adposition order, genitive order, relative clause order, and subordinator order — the head-direction generalization formalized in the cross-tabulations above.

                                            Instances For
                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For

                                                A language's basic word-order profile across WALS Chapters 81--83.

                                                Pairing a language's 6-way basic order (Ch 81) with its binary S-V (Ch 82) and O-V (Ch 83) classifications enables cross-chapter consistency checks: e.g., an SOV language should have SV order and OV order.

                                                • language : String

                                                  Language name.

                                                • iso : String

                                                  ISO 639-3 code.

                                                • basicOrder : BasicOrder

                                                  Ch 81: basic order of S, O, V.

                                                • svOrder : SVOrder

                                                  Ch 82: order of subject and verb.

                                                • ovOrder : OVOrder

                                                  Ch 83: order of object and verb.

                                                • notes : String

                                                  Notes on the word-order system.

                                                Instances For
                                                  Equations
                                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                  Instances For

                                                    Japanese: rigid SOV with postpositions, relative clause before noun, genitive before noun. The canonical head-final language.

                                                    Equations
                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                    Instances For

                                                      Turkish: SOV with postpositions. Relatively free word order for pragmatic effects, but SOV is strongly dominant.

                                                      Equations
                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                      Instances For

                                                        Hindi-Urdu: SOV with postpositions. Word order is relatively flexible due to case marking, but SOV is the default neutral order.

                                                        Equations
                                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                        Instances For

                                                          Korean: rigid SOV with postpositions, relative clause before noun. Very similar head-final profile to Japanese.

                                                          Equations
                                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                          Instances For

                                                            Quechua (Southern): rigid SOV with postpositions, suffixal morphology. One of the most consistently head-final languages.

                                                            Equations
                                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                            Instances For

                                                              Basque: SOV with postpositions. Ergative-absolutive case system. Word order is flexible but SOV is the pragmatically neutral order.

                                                              Equations
                                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                              Instances For

                                                                English: rigid SVO with prepositions and relative clause after noun. The canonical head-initial language (among non-V-initial types).

                                                                Equations
                                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                Instances For

                                                                  Mandarin Chinese: SVO with prepositions (mostly). Some constructions are head-final (relative clause before noun, some postpositions), making Mandarin a mixed-headedness language.

                                                                  Equations
                                                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                  Instances For

                                                                    Russian: SVO as the pragmatically neutral order, but word order is relatively free due to rich case morphology.

                                                                    Equations
                                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                    Instances For

                                                                      Swahili: SVO with prepositions. Bantu language with rich verbal agreement that cross-references subject and object.

                                                                      Equations
                                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                      Instances For

                                                                        Indonesian: SVO with prepositions. Relatively rigid word order for an Austronesian language.

                                                                        Equations
                                                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                        Instances For

                                                                          Arabic (Modern Standard): VSO as the classical/formal basic order, though SVO is increasingly common in spoken varieties.

                                                                          Equations
                                                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                          Instances For

                                                                            Irish: VSO with prepositions, relative clause after noun. Celtic languages are the canonical European VSO family.

                                                                            Equations
                                                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                            Instances For

                                                                              Tagalog: VSO / VOS (verb-initial with flexible S/O ordering). WALS classifies as VSO based on pragmatically neutral clauses. Philippine-type voice system complicates the S vs O distinction.

                                                                              Equations
                                                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                              Instances For

                                                                                Welsh: VSO with prepositions, relative clause after noun. Another Celtic VSO language.

                                                                                Equations
                                                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                Instances For

                                                                                  Malagasy: VOS with prepositions. The best-known VOS language, extensively studied in formal syntax.

                                                                                  Equations
                                                                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                  Instances For

                                                                                    Tzotzil (Mayan): VOS basic order, common in the Mayan family.

                                                                                    Equations
                                                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                    Instances For

                                                                                      Hixkaryana (Cariban; Brazil): the first language for which OVS basic order was convincingly demonstrated. This discovery refuted the earlier claim that OVS and OSV orders were unattested.

                                                                                      Equations
                                                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                      Instances For

                                                                                        German: V2 in main clauses, SOV in embedded clauses. WALS classifies as SVO, but many syntacticians analyze the underlying order as SOV with V2 movement. The tension makes "no dominant order" defensible (though WALS itself codes German as SVO).

                                                                                        Equations
                                                                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                        Instances For

                                                                                          Warlpiri (Pama-Nyungan; Australia): radically free word order, with all six permutations of S, O, V attested in natural discourse. The canonical non-configurational language.

                                                                                          Equations
                                                                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                          Instances For

                                                                                            All basic-order language profiles in the sample.

                                                                                            Equations
                                                                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                            Instances For

                                                                                              Count of languages in a profile list with a given basic order.

                                                                                              Equations
                                                                                              Instances For

                                                                                                Count of languages in a profile list with a given S-V order.

                                                                                                Equations
                                                                                                Instances For

                                                                                                  Count of languages in a profile list with a given O-V order.

                                                                                                  Equations
                                                                                                  Instances For

                                                                                                    Generalization 8: Cross-chapter consistency — all SOV languages in our sample have OV order (Ch 83) and SV order (Ch 82).

                                                                                                    Cross-chapter consistency — all SVO languages in our sample have SV order (Ch 82) and VO order (Ch 83).

                                                                                                    Cross-chapter consistency — all VSO languages in our sample have VS order (Ch 82) and VO order (Ch 83).

                                                                                                    Cross-chapter consistency — all VOS languages in our sample have VS order (Ch 82) and VO order (Ch 83).

                                                                                                    Generalization 9: All OV languages in our sample have basic order SOV or OVS (the two S-containing OV orders).

                                                                                                    Number of languages in our basic-order profile sample.

                                                                                                    For each profile whose language is in WALS Ch 81A, prove its basic order matches the WALS data. Languages not in the WALS sample (Malagasy, Quechua) are excluded — their profiles are ungrounded assertions.