Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.ScalarImplicatures.ArgumentativeFraming

Argumentative Framing: Empirical Data #

@cite{cummins-franke-2021} @cite{macuch-silva-etal-2024}

Empirical observations from two papers on how speakers use quantity expressions to serve argumentative goals:

  1. @cite{cummins-franke-2021}: REF case study showing universities choose "top M" claims strategically — always round numbers near their actual rank.
  2. Macuch @cite{macuch-silva-etal-2024}: Production experiments showing quantifier choice is driven by argumentative difficulty and framing direction.

Data Sources #

Framing direction: positive (high success) or negative (low success)

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Quantifier choices from MS et al.'s experimental materials

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            A "top M" datum from C&F Table 1

            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                C&F examples 29–38: UK universities' "top M" claims.

                All claimed M values are round numbers (multiples of 5 or 10), and all are ≥ the institution's actual rank on the cited measure.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  H1 verification: all claimed M values are round (multiples of 5)

                  H1 verification: all actual ranks are ≤ claimed M (claim is truthful)

                  H2 data: ranking measure preference.

                  Of 19 institutions that could cite either GPA or Power ranking:

                  • 9 cite GPA (where they rank higher on GPA)
                  • 11 cite Power (where they rank higher on Power) — but see below Actually C&F report that institutions systematically prefer the measure on which they rank better.
                  • totalInstitutions :
                  • citedPreferredMeasure :
                  • citedNonPreferredMeasure :
                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      H2 summary: institutions cite the measure giving them a better rank

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        An Experiment 1 datum: quantifier + adjective choice for exam results

                        Instances For
                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            Key finding: adjective choice matches framing condition.

                            92% choose "right" in high-success condition; ~10% in low-success. This confirms speakers attend to argumentative goals.

                            Equations
                            Instances For

                              Key finding: "some" and "most" dominate quantifier choices.

                              Together they account for ~76% of responses, showing speakers avoid the extreme quantifiers ("all", "none") even when truthful.

                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                Key finding: difficulty drives quantifier weakening.

                                As proportion moves away from extremes (difficulty ↑):

                                • At proportion > 0.5 (easy): "all"/"most" available → speakers use "most"
                                • At proportion ~0.5 (medium): "most" barely available → "some" rises
                                • At proportion < 0.3 (hard): only "some" available
                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  Key finding: positive framing bias.

                                  74% of free-form descriptions framed the result positively, regardless of the actual proportion correct.

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    Key finding: quantifier + numeral is the dominant strategy.

                                    Speakers prefer combining a quantifier with a numeral (e.g., "most of the 60 questions") over pure quantifier or pure numeral descriptions.

                                    Equations
                                    Instances For

                                      Framing strategy proportions from Experiment 2

                                      Instances For
                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          Experiment 2 strategy breakdown

                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For

                                            Quantifier + numeral is the most common single strategy