Nandao-Q Empirical Data #
@cite{zheng-2025}
Theory-neutral data on Mandarin nandao-question felicity. The core finding is that positive evidential bias is necessary for nandao-Q felicity, while negative epistemic bias is neither necessary nor sufficient.
Key Generalizations #
- Positive evidential bias (contextual evidence for p) → nandao felicitous
- Epistemic bias alone (prior belief against p, no evidence) → nandao infelicitous
- Evidence must be unexpected relative to prior information state
- Nandao-Qs can function as pure inquiry (no prior belief required)
A nandao-Q felicity datum.
- exampleNum : String
Example number from @cite{zheng-2025}
- context : String
Context description
- sentence : String
The nandao-Q sentence (pinyin)
- evidentialBias : Bool
Is there positive evidential bias (contextual evidence for p)?
- epistemicBias : Bool
Is there negative epistemic bias (prior belief against p)?
- unexpectedEvidence : Bool
Is the evidence unexpected?
- felicitous : Bool
Is the nandao-Q felicitous?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Phenomena.Questions.NandaoQs.instBEqNandaoDatum.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Ex. 1: Rhetorical use. Lee working on Sunday (evidence) contradicts B's norm that people don't work Sundays (epistemic/deontic bias).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Ex. 2: Biased question. A believes not-raining; B enters with dripping raincoat (evidence contradicting belief).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Ex. 3: Pure inquiry (NOVEL). Same evidence as ex. 2 but A has NO prior belief about the weather. Nandao is still felicitous.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Ex. 4a: Epistemic bias without evidence. Speaker believes room is empty but has no contextual evidence either way.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Ex. 5 ctx 1: Evidence + no belief → felicitous.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Ex. 5 ctx 2: No evidence + no belief → infelicitous.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Ex. 5 ctx 3: No evidence + epistemic bias → infelicitous.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Ex. 6 ctx 1: Unexpected evidence → felicitous.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Ex. 6 ctx 2: Expected evidence → infelicitous.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Generalization 1: All felicitous nandao-Qs have evidential bias.
Generalization 2: Some felicitous nandao-Qs lack epistemic bias (the pure inquiry use).
Generalization 3: Some infelicitous nandao-Qs have epistemic bias (epistemic bias is not sufficient).
Generalization 4: All felicitous nandao-Qs have unexpected evidence.
9 data points from 6 examples covering 4 conditions.