Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Questions.NandaoQs

Nandao-Q Empirical Data #

@cite{zheng-2025}

Theory-neutral data on Mandarin nandao-question felicity. The core finding is that positive evidential bias is necessary for nandao-Q felicity, while negative epistemic bias is neither necessary nor sufficient.

Key Generalizations #

  1. Positive evidential bias (contextual evidence for p) → nandao felicitous
  2. Epistemic bias alone (prior belief against p, no evidence) → nandao infelicitous
  3. Evidence must be unexpected relative to prior information state
  4. Nandao-Qs can function as pure inquiry (no prior belief required)

A nandao-Q felicity datum.

  • exampleNum : String

    Example number from @cite{zheng-2025}

  • context : String

    Context description

  • sentence : String

    The nandao-Q sentence (pinyin)

  • evidentialBias : Bool

    Is there positive evidential bias (contextual evidence for p)?

  • epistemicBias : Bool

    Is there negative epistemic bias (prior belief against p)?

  • unexpectedEvidence : Bool

    Is the evidence unexpected?

  • felicitous : Bool

    Is the nandao-Q felicitous?

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For
        Equations
        Instances For

          Ex. 1: Rhetorical use. Lee working on Sunday (evidence) contradicts B's norm that people don't work Sundays (epistemic/deontic bias).

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Ex. 2: Biased question. A believes not-raining; B enters with dripping raincoat (evidence contradicting belief).

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Ex. 3: Pure inquiry (NOVEL). Same evidence as ex. 2 but A has NO prior belief about the weather. Nandao is still felicitous.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Ex. 4a: Epistemic bias without evidence. Speaker believes room is empty but has no contextual evidence either way.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Ex. 5 ctx 1: Evidence + no belief → felicitous.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Ex. 5 ctx 2: No evidence + no belief → infelicitous.

                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Ex. 5 ctx 3: No evidence + epistemic bias → infelicitous.

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Ex. 6 ctx 1: Unexpected evidence → felicitous.

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Ex. 6 ctx 2: Expected evidence → infelicitous.

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Generalization 1: All felicitous nandao-Qs have evidential bias.

                              Generalization 2: Some felicitous nandao-Qs lack epistemic bias (the pure inquiry use).

                              Generalization 3: Some infelicitous nandao-Qs have epistemic bias (epistemic bias is not sufficient).

                              Generalization 4: All felicitous nandao-Qs have unexpected evidence.

                              9 data points from 6 examples covering 4 conditions.