Psych Verb Data (@cite{belletti-rizzi-1988}, @cite{kim-2024}) #
@cite{belletti-rizzi-1988} @cite{kim-2024}
Theory-neutral empirical data on psych verbs from @cite{belletti-rizzi-1988} and @cite{kim-2024}.
@cite{belletti-rizzi-1988} classification #
| Class | Subject | Object | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | experiencer | theme | "Mary enjoys jazz" / It. temere |
| II | stimulus/cause | experiencer | "Jazz interests Mary" / It. preoccupare |
| III | (dative experiencer) | It. "A Gianni piace la musica" |
B&R syntactic diagnostics (§§1–2) #
The Class I/II split is diagnosed by five syntactic tests:
- Anaphoric cliticization (§1.1): Class II allows partitive ne from subject; Class I does not
- Arbitrary pro (§1.2): Class I allows arb pro subject; Class II does not
- Causative fare (§1.3): Class I embeds under fare infinitive; Class II does not (but see caveat: preoccupare-class verbs embed under fare due to independent unaccusative representation, B&R ex. 37)
- Backward binding (§2.1): Class II allows object-to-subject binding; Class I does not
- Passive type (§1.5): Class II passive is adjectival; Class I is verbal
@cite{kim-2024} diagnostics #
Kim extends B&R with two further diagnostics on the within-Class II split: 5. Intensionality (Ch. 4): Stative Class II verbs create intensional subject positions; eventive Class II verbs do not 6. T/SM restriction (Ch. 5): Cause and Subject Matter cannot cooccur
@cite{belletti-rizzi-1988} classification of psych verbs.
- classI : PsychVerbClass
- classII : PsychVerbClass
- classIII : PsychVerbClass
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data.instBEqPsychVerbClass.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Aspectual reading of a Class II psych verb.
- eventive : ClassIIReading
- stative : ClassIIReading
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data.instBEqClassIIReading.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
B&R syntactic diagnostic for discriminating psych verb classes (§§1–2).
- anaphoricCliticization : BRDiagnostic
- arbitraryPro : BRDiagnostic
- causativeFare : BRDiagnostic
- backwardBinding : BRDiagnostic
- adjectivalPassive : BRDiagnostic
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data.instBEqBRDiagnostic.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Result of a B&R diagnostic applied to each class.
classI/classII record whether the class passes the test.
- diagnostic : BRDiagnostic
- classI : Bool
- classII : Bool
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data.instBEqBRDiagnosticResult.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
@cite{belletti-rizzi-1988} diagnostic data.
| Diagnostic | Class I (temere) | Class II (preoccupare) |
|---|---|---|
| Anaphoric clitic ne (§1.1) | ✗ | ✓ (11a) |
| Arbitrary pro (§1.2) | ✓ (24a) | ✗ (24b) |
| Causative fare (§1.3) | ✓ (35) | ✗ (36) |
| Backward binding (§2.1) | ✗ | ✓ (57a) |
| Adjectival passive (§1.5) | ✗ | ✓ (47) |
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Every B&R diagnostic discriminates Class I from Class II: the two classes never give the same result on any test.
Class I passes arb-pro and causative-fare but fails the other three.
Class II shows the mirror pattern: passes ne-cliticization, backward binding, and adjectival passive; fails arb-pro and causative-fare.
The Class I/II distinction is characterized by theta-role reversal: Class I maps experiencer to subject, Class II maps experiencer to object.
| Position | Class I | Class II |
|---|---|---|
| Subject | experiencer | stimulus |
| Object | stimulus/theme | experiencer |
- experiencer : SubjectRole
- stimulus : SubjectRole
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data.instBEqSubjectRole.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Map from B&R class to expected subject role.
Equations
- Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data.PsychVerbClass.classI.expectedSubjectRole = some Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data.SubjectRole.experiencer
- Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data.PsychVerbClass.classII.expectedSubjectRole = some Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data.SubjectRole.stimulus
- Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data.PsychVerbClass.classIII.expectedSubjectRole = none
Instances For
Intensionality datum: does substitution of co-referential terms fail in subject position?
- Stative "concern": "Cicero concerns Mary" ≠ "Tully concerns Mary" (can differ in truth value — substitution fails)
- Eventive "frighten": "Cicero frightened Mary" = "Tully frightened Mary" (same truth value — substitution succeeds)
- verb : String
- reading : ClassIIReading
- substitutionFails : Bool
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data.instBEqIntensionalityDatum.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Empirical intensionality data from @cite{kim-2024}.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The T/SM restriction: Cause and Subject Matter cannot cooccur.
*"The noise about the deadline concerned John" — both "the noise" (Cause) and "about the deadline" (SM) present → ill-formed.
This follows from the Onset Condition: both map to the onset position of the causal chain, but only one slot is available.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data.instBEqTSMRestriction.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Cause and SM cannot cooccur.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Stative Class II verbs create intensional subject positions.
Eventive Class II verbs have extensional subject positions.
Cause + SM cooccurrence is always ill-formed.