Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.PsychVerbs.Data

Psych Verb Data (@cite{belletti-rizzi-1988}, @cite{kim-2024}) #

@cite{belletti-rizzi-1988} @cite{kim-2024}

Theory-neutral empirical data on psych verbs from @cite{belletti-rizzi-1988} and @cite{kim-2024}.

@cite{belletti-rizzi-1988} classification #

ClassSubjectObjectExample
Iexperiencertheme"Mary enjoys jazz" / It. temere
IIstimulus/causeexperiencer"Jazz interests Mary" / It. preoccupare
III(dative experiencer)It. "A Gianni piace la musica"

B&R syntactic diagnostics (§§1–2) #

The Class I/II split is diagnosed by five syntactic tests:

  1. Anaphoric cliticization (§1.1): Class II allows partitive ne from subject; Class I does not
  2. Arbitrary pro (§1.2): Class I allows arb pro subject; Class II does not
  3. Causative fare (§1.3): Class I embeds under fare infinitive; Class II does not (but see caveat: preoccupare-class verbs embed under fare due to independent unaccusative representation, B&R ex. 37)
  4. Backward binding (§2.1): Class II allows object-to-subject binding; Class I does not
  5. Passive type (§1.5): Class II passive is adjectival; Class I is verbal

@cite{kim-2024} diagnostics #

Kim extends B&R with two further diagnostics on the within-Class II split: 5. Intensionality (Ch. 4): Stative Class II verbs create intensional subject positions; eventive Class II verbs do not 6. T/SM restriction (Ch. 5): Cause and Subject Matter cannot cooccur

@cite{belletti-rizzi-1988} classification of psych verbs.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Aspectual reading of a Class II psych verb.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          B&R syntactic diagnostic for discriminating psych verb classes (§§1–2).

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Result of a B&R diagnostic applied to each class. classI/classII record whether the class passes the test.

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For
                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    @cite{belletti-rizzi-1988} diagnostic data.

                    DiagnosticClass I (temere)Class II (preoccupare)
                    Anaphoric clitic ne (§1.1)✓ (11a)
                    Arbitrary pro (§1.2)✓ (24a)✗ (24b)
                    Causative fare (§1.3)✓ (35)✗ (36)
                    Backward binding (§2.1)✓ (57a)
                    Adjectival passive (§1.5)✓ (47)
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Every B&R diagnostic discriminates Class I from Class II: the two classes never give the same result on any test.

                      Class II shows the mirror pattern: passes ne-cliticization, backward binding, and adjectival passive; fails arb-pro and causative-fare.

                      The Class I/II distinction is characterized by theta-role reversal: Class I maps experiencer to subject, Class II maps experiencer to object.

                      PositionClass IClass II
                      Subjectexperiencerstimulus
                      Objectstimulus/themeexperiencer
                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Intensionality datum: does substitution of co-referential terms fail in subject position?

                          • Stative "concern": "Cicero concerns Mary" ≠ "Tully concerns Mary" (can differ in truth value — substitution fails)
                          • Eventive "frighten": "Cicero frightened Mary" = "Tully frightened Mary" (same truth value — substitution succeeds)
                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                Empirical intensionality data from @cite{kim-2024}.

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  The T/SM restriction: Cause and Subject Matter cannot cooccur.

                                  *"The noise about the deadline concerned John" — both "the noise" (Cause) and "about the deadline" (SM) present → ill-formed.

                                  This follows from the Onset Condition: both map to the onset position of the causal chain, but only one slot is available.

                                  Instances For
                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For
                                      Equations
                                      Instances For

                                        Cause and SM cannot cooccur.

                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          Cause + SM cooccurrence is always ill-formed.