Cross-Linguistic Typology of Pronouns (WALS Chapters 39--40, 44--48) #
@cite{dryer-haspelmath-2013} @cite{dryer-haspelmath-2013}
Typological data on pronoun systems across languages, drawn from seven chapters of the World Atlas of Language Structures. These chapters cover the major dimensions along which pronoun systems vary cross-linguistically: clusivity, gender, politeness, indefiniteness strategy, the intensifier-- reflexive connection, and person marking on adpositions.
Ch 39: Inclusive/Exclusive in Independent Pronouns (200 languages) #
Whether a language distinguishes inclusive ('we including you') from exclusive ('we excluding you') first-person plural pronouns. The majority of languages (120/200 = 60%) make no such distinction. Languages with the distinction (63/200 = 31.5%) are concentrated in Oceanic, Australian, and some South American families.
Ch 40: Inclusive/Exclusive in Verbal Inflection (200 languages) #
The same inclusive/exclusive dimension, but in verbal agreement morphology rather than independent pronouns. Many languages that distinguish clusivity in pronouns lack it in verbal inflection: 70/200 languages have no person marking on verbs at all.
Ch 44: Gender Distinctions in Independent Personal Pronouns (378 languages) #
Where in the person paradigm gender is marked. The majority of languages (254/378 = 67.2%) have no gender distinctions in pronouns at all. When gender is marked, it most commonly appears in the 3rd person singular (61/378 = 16.1%), consistent with the functional explanation that gender is most useful for disambiguating reference where multiple potential antecedents exist.
Ch 45: Politeness Distinctions in Pronouns (207 languages) #
Whether and how pronouns encode social relationships. Most languages lack politeness distinctions in pronouns (136/207 = 65.7%). Binary T/V systems (49/207 = 23.7%) are the most common positive value. Some languages avoid pronouns entirely for politeness (7/207 = 3.4%), using titles or kin terms instead.
Ch 46: Indefinite Pronouns (326 languages) #
The morphological source of indefinite pronouns ('someone', 'something'). Interrogative-based indefinites (194/326 = 59.5%) are the most common strategy worldwide, reflecting the well-known interrogative--indefinite connection. Generic-noun-based indefinites (85/326 = 26.1%) use words like 'person' or 'thing' as bases.
Ch 47: Intensifiers and Reflexive Pronouns (168 languages) #
Whether intensifiers ('X herself did it') and reflexive pronouns ('X saw herself') use the same or different forms. Languages split nearly evenly: 94/168 (56%) use identical forms, 74/168 (44%) differentiate them.
Ch 48: Person Marking on Adpositions (378 languages) #
Whether adpositions (prepositions/postpositions) can bear person marking. The majority of languages (209/378 = 55.3%) have adpositions but no person marking on them. A substantial minority (83/378 = 22.0%) mark pronouns on adpositions (e.g. Hebrew 'in-me', 'in-you'). 63 languages (16.7%) lack adpositions entirely.
WALS Ch 39: Inclusive/exclusive distinction in independent pronouns.
- noWe : InclusiveExclusive
No first-person plural pronoun at all.
- weEqualsI : InclusiveExclusive
'We' is the same form as 'I' (no number distinction in 1st person).
- noDistinction : InclusiveExclusive
First-person plural exists but does not distinguish inclusive from exclusive.
- onlyInclusive : InclusiveExclusive
Only an inclusive form; no dedicated exclusive pronoun.
- inclusiveExclusive : InclusiveExclusive
Full inclusive/exclusive distinction in 1st-person plural.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
WALS Ch 40: Inclusive/exclusive distinction in verbal inflection.
- noPersonMarking : InclusiveExclusiveVerbal
No person marking on verbs at all.
- weEqualsI : InclusiveExclusiveVerbal
'We' verbal form is the same as 'I' form.
- noDistinction : InclusiveExclusiveVerbal
Person marking exists but no inclusive/exclusive distinction.
- onlyInclusive : InclusiveExclusiveVerbal
Only inclusive marking in verbal inflection.
- inclusiveExclusive : InclusiveExclusiveVerbal
Full inclusive/exclusive distinction in verbal inflection.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
WALS Ch 44: Where gender distinctions appear in the pronoun paradigm.
- in3rdAndOtherPersons : GenderInPronouns
Gender in 3rd person AND in 1st and/or 2nd person (e.g. Arabic, Hebrew).
- in3rdPersonIncludingNonSg : GenderInPronouns
Gender in 3rd person only, including non-singular forms (e.g. Polish, Albanian).
- in3rdPersonSgOnly : GenderInPronouns
Gender in 3rd person singular only (e.g. English he/she/it).
- in1stOr2ndOnly : GenderInPronouns
Gender in 1st or 2nd person but not 3rd (rare; e.g. Iraqw).
- in3rdPersonNonSgOnly : GenderInPronouns
Gender in 3rd person non-singular only (extremely rare).
- noGenderDistinctions : GenderInPronouns
No gender distinctions in pronouns at all (e.g. Finnish, Turkish, Japanese).
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Pronouns.Typology.instBEqGenderInPronouns.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
WALS Ch 45: Politeness (honorific/formality) distinctions in pronouns.
- none : PolitenessDistinction
No politeness distinction in pronouns (e.g. English).
- binary : PolitenessDistinction
Binary T/V distinction (e.g. French tu/vous, German du/Sie).
- multiple : PolitenessDistinction
Multiple levels of politeness (e.g. Japanese, Hindi, Tagalog).
- pronounsAvoided : PolitenessDistinction
Pronouns avoided entirely for politeness; titles or kin terms used instead (e.g. Korean, Thai).
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
WALS Ch 46: Morphological source of indefinite pronouns ('someone', 'something').
- interrogativeBased : IndefinitePronounType
Based on interrogative forms (e.g. Japanese dare-ka 'who-Q' = 'someone').
- genericNounBased : IndefinitePronounType
Based on generic nouns (e.g. English 'somebody' from 'some' + 'body').
- special : IndefinitePronounType
Special, dedicated indefinite forms unrelated to interrogatives or generic nouns.
- mixed : IndefinitePronounType
Mixed: some indefinites are interrogative-based, others generic-noun-based.
- existentialConstruction : IndefinitePronounType
Existential construction used instead of indefinite pronouns.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
WALS Ch 47: Relationship between intensifiers and reflexive pronouns.
- identical : IntensifierReflexive
Identical forms for intensifier ('she herself did it') and reflexive ('she saw herself').
- differentiated : IntensifierReflexive
Different, morphologically unrelated forms for intensifier and reflexive.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
WALS Ch 48: Whether adpositions bear person-marking morphology.
- noAdpositions : PersonMarkingOnAdpositions
Language has no adpositions at all (typically head-marking or caseless languages).
- noPersonMarking : PersonMarkingOnAdpositions
Adpositions exist but do not bear person marking.
- pronounsOnly : PersonMarkingOnAdpositions
Only pronominal complements trigger person marking on adpositions (e.g. Hebrew be-xa 'in-you').
- pronounsAndNouns : PersonMarkingOnAdpositions
Both pronominal and nominal complements trigger person marking on adpositions.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
WALS Ch 39B: Inclusive/exclusive forms in Pama-Nyungan languages.
An areal sub-feature restricted to the Pama-Nyungan family of Australian languages. Of 71 languages sampled, 40 (56%) differentiate inclusive and exclusive first-person plural, while 31 (44%) do not.
- noOpposition : InclusiveExclusivePamaNyungan
No inclusive/exclusive opposition in first-person plural.
- differentiated : InclusiveExclusivePamaNyungan
Inclusive and exclusive forms are differentiated.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A language's pronoun system profile across WALS Chapters 39--40, 44--48.
Not all chapters have data for every language (WALS samples vary by chapter), so each field is optional.
- language : String
Language name.
- family : String
Language family.
- iso : String
ISO 639-3 code.
- inclusiveExclusive : Option InclusiveExclusive
Ch 39: Inclusive/exclusive distinction in independent pronouns.
- inclusiveExclusiveVerbal : Option InclusiveExclusiveVerbal
Ch 40: Inclusive/exclusive distinction in verbal inflection.
- genderInPronouns : Option GenderInPronouns
Ch 44: Gender distinctions in independent personal pronouns.
- politeness : Option PolitenessDistinction
Ch 45: Politeness distinctions in pronouns.
- indefiniteType : Option IndefinitePronounType
Ch 46: Indefinite pronoun strategy.
- intensifierReflexive : Option IntensifierReflexive
Ch 47: Intensifier--reflexive relationship.
- personMarkingAdpositions : Option PersonMarkingOnAdpositions
Ch 48: Person marking on adpositions.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
English (Indo-European, Germanic). No inclusive/exclusive distinction in pronouns or verbal inflection. Gender in 3rd person singular only (he/she/it). No politeness distinction in pronouns. Generic-noun-based indefinites (somebody, something). Intensifier and reflexive use identical forms (himself/herself). No person marking on adpositions.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
German (Indo-European, Germanic). No inclusive/exclusive distinction. Gender in 3rd person singular only (er/sie/es). Binary politeness distinction (du/Sie). Mixed indefinite strategy (jemand is special, irgendwer interrogative-based). Intensifier (selbst) differentiated from reflexive (sich). No person marking on adpositions.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
French (Indo-European, Romance). No inclusive/exclusive distinction. Gender in 3rd person singular only (il/elle). Binary politeness distinction (tu/vous). Generic-noun-based indefinites (quelqu'un from quel + un). Intensifier (meme) differentiated from reflexive (se). No person marking on adpositions.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Spanish (Indo-European, Romance). No inclusive/exclusive distinction. Gender in 3rd person AND 1st/2nd person (nosotros/nosotras, etc.). Binary politeness distinction (tu/usted). Special indefinite forms (alguien, algo). Intensifier (mismo) differentiated from reflexive (se). No person marking on adpositions.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Russian (Indo-European, Slavic). No inclusive/exclusive distinction. Gender in 3rd person singular only (on/ona/ono). Binary politeness distinction (ty/vy). Interrogative-based indefinites (kto-to, kto-nibud'). Intensifier (sam) differentiated from reflexive (sebja). No person marking on adpositions.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Japanese (Japonic). No inclusive/exclusive distinction in pronouns. No person marking on verbs (hence no clusivity in verbal inflection). 3rd-person pronoun gender: WALS classifies as 3rd person only, including non-singular (kare/kanojo distinction). Pronouns avoided for politeness (titles, kin terms, names used instead). Interrogative-based indefinites (dare-ka 'who-Q' = 'someone'). Intensifier and reflexive use identical form (jibun). No person marking on adpositions.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Mandarin Chinese (Sino-Tibetan). Inclusive/exclusive distinction in independent pronouns (women vs zanmen). No person marking on verbs. Gender in 3rd person singular only (ta with different characters). Binary politeness distinction (ni/nin). Mixed indefinite strategy (interrogative-based and others). Intensifier and reflexive use identical form (ziji). No person marking on adpositions.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Korean (Koreanic). No inclusive/exclusive distinction. No person marking on verbs. Gender in 3rd person singular only (ku/kunyo). Pronouns avoided for politeness (elaborate honorific system uses titles and names instead of pronouns). Interrogative-based indefinites (nwukwunka from nwukwu 'who'). Intensifier and reflexive use identical form (caki). No person marking on adpositions.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Turkish (Turkic). No inclusive/exclusive distinction. No inclusive/exclusive in verbal inflection (but has person marking). No gender distinctions in pronouns (o is used for all genders). Binary politeness distinction (sen/siz). Generic-noun-based indefinites (birisi from bir 'one'). Intensifier and reflexive use identical form (kendi). No person marking on adpositions.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Finnish (Uralic). No inclusive/exclusive distinction. No inclusive/exclusive in verbal inflection (but has person marking). No gender distinctions in pronouns (han is used for all genders). Binary politeness distinction (sina/te). Special indefinite forms (joku, jokin). Intensifier and reflexive use identical form (itse). Person marking on adpositions (pronouns only: kanssa-ni 'with-me').
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hungarian (Uralic). No inclusive/exclusive distinction. No inclusive/exclusive in verbal inflection (but has person marking). No gender distinctions in pronouns (o is used for all genders). Multiple politeness distinctions (te/On/maga). Interrogative-based indefinites (valaki from val- 'some' + ki 'who'). Intensifier and reflexive use identical form (maga). Person marking on adpositions (pronouns only: velem 'with-me').
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Hindi (Indo-European, Indo-Aryan). No inclusive/exclusive distinction in pronouns. No person marking on verbs (WALS classification). No gender distinctions in pronouns (vah/ye are gender-neutral). Multiple politeness distinctions (tu/tum/aap). Special indefinite forms (koi, kuch). Intensifier and reflexive use identical form (apne-aap/khud). No person marking on adpositions.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Arabic (Egyptian) (Afro-Asiatic, Semitic). No inclusive/exclusive distinction. No inclusive/exclusive in verbal inflection (but has person marking). Gender in 3rd person AND 1st/2nd person (inta/inti, huwwa/hiyya). No politeness distinction in pronouns. Generic-noun-based indefinites (hadd 'person' = 'someone'). No data for intensifier/reflexive in WALS Ch 47. Person marking on adpositions (pronouns only: fi-ya 'in-me').
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Swahili (Niger-Congo, Bantu). No inclusive/exclusive distinction. No inclusive/exclusive in verbal inflection (but has person marking). Gender in 3rd person only, including non-singular (via noun-class system). No politeness distinction in pronouns. Generic-noun-based indefinites (mtu 'person' = 'someone'). Intensifier (mwenyewe) differentiated from reflexive (ji-). No person marking on adpositions.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Tagalog (Austronesian, Philippine). Inclusive/exclusive distinction in independent pronouns (kami vs tayo). No person marking on verbs (WALS classification). No gender distinctions in pronouns (siya is gender-neutral). Multiple politeness distinctions (ikaw/kayo/po system). Existential construction for indefinite reference. Intensifier (mismo) differentiated from reflexive (sarili). No adpositions (WALS classification).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All 15 language profiles.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The majority of languages (120/200 = 60%) make no inclusive/exclusive distinction in independent pronouns.
No gender distinctions in pronouns is the majority pattern (254/378 = 67.2%). When gender is present, 3rd-person-singular-only is the most common locus.
Most languages lack politeness distinctions in pronouns (136/207 = 65.7%).
Interrogative-based indefinites are the most common strategy (194/326 = 59.5%), reflecting the cross-linguistically robust interrogative--indefinite connection.
Languages split nearly evenly on whether intensifiers and reflexives are identical (94) or differentiated (74), with a slight majority using identical forms.