Presuppositions of forget Across Complement Frames #
@cite{kiparsky-kiparsky-1970} @cite{williams-2026} @cite{white-2014} @misc{white-2014}
Theory-neutral empirical data from @cite{ippolito-kiss-williams-2026}, who shows that forget is uniformly factive across all complement types, but the content of the presupposition varies:
- With finite CPs and PRO-ing gerunds: the presupposition is non-modal (directly presupposes complement truth)
- With plain to-infinitives: the presupposition is modal (presupposes an obligation or plan)
This file records the empirical judgments that motivate the SMINC generalization (Selectivity of Modal Insertion in Non-finite Contexts): the covert modal only appears with plain infinitives.
Key Data (Table 1, p. 8) #
| Complement | Example | Presup content |
|---|---|---|
| finite CP | "forgot that she stopped" | non-modal (she stopped) |
| PRO-ing gerund | "forgot stopping by" | non-modal (stopped) |
| plain infinitive | "forgot to stop by" | modal (was supposed to stop) |
Uniform Factivity #
The paper follows @cite{white-2014} in arguing that forget is canonically factive in ALL uses — both the cognition reading ("forgot that p") and the psych-action reading ("forgot to VP"). There is no lexical ambiguity. What varies is the content of the presupposition, not its presence.
Whether a factive presupposition has modal content.
@cite{ippolito-kiss-williams-2026} shows that forget always presupposes, but the content varies by complement type:
.nonModal: directly presupposes complement truth.modal: presupposes a modalized version (obligation/plan)
- nonModal : PresupContent
Directly presupposes complement truth: "forgot that p" → presupposes p
- modal : PresupContent
Presupposes a modalized version: "forgot to VP" → presupposes should VP
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
An empirical judgment about forget's presupposition in a particular complement frame.
Every entry has a presupposition (uniform factivity); what varies is the content (modal vs. non-modal).
- frame : Core.Verbs.ComplementType
Complement frame being tested
- sentence : String
Example sentence
- presupParaphrase : String
What is presupposed (paraphrase)
- content : PresupContent
Is the presupposition modal or non-modal?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Phenomena.Presupposition.ForgetPresuppositions.instBEqForgetJudgment.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Cognition reading (finite CP) #
"Forgot that p" presupposes p (non-modal). This is the canonical factive reading recognized since @cite{kiparsky-kiparsky-1970}.
@cite{ippolito-kiss-williams-2026}, ex. (1): "Ana forgot that she stopped by the flower shop." Presupposes: Ana stopped by the flower shop.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Cognition reading (PRO-ing gerund) #
"Forgot V-ing" presupposes V-ing occurred (non-modal). This is the critical evidence against the Modalized Complement Analysis's overprediction: the gerund is non-finite but NOT modalized.
@cite{ippolito-kiss-williams-2026}, ex. (12): "Ana forgot stopping by the flower shop." Presupposes: Ana stopped by the flower shop.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Psych-action reading (plain infinitive) #
"Forgot to VP" presupposes a plan or obligation to VP (modal). Un@cite{ippolito-kiss-williams-2026}, this arises because the plain infinitive's forward-oriented temporal profile violates the pre-existence presupposition, triggering covert modal insertion.
@cite{ippolito-kiss-williams-2026}, ex. (3): "Ana forgot to stop by the flower shop." Presupposes: Ana was supposed to / had a plan to stop.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All forget judgments across complement frames.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Uniform factivity: forget has a presupposition in every frame. (All entries exist — there is no "absent presupposition" case.)
Not all presuppositions are modal: finite and gerund cases are non-modal.
Not all presuppositions are non-modal: the infinitival case is modal.
The modal presupposition arises with exactly one frame (the infinitival).
The non-modal presupposition arises with exactly two frames.