Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Presupposition.ForgetPresuppositions

Presuppositions of forget Across Complement Frames #

@cite{kiparsky-kiparsky-1970} @cite{williams-2026} @cite{white-2014} @misc{white-2014}

Theory-neutral empirical data from @cite{ippolito-kiss-williams-2026}, who shows that forget is uniformly factive across all complement types, but the content of the presupposition varies:

This file records the empirical judgments that motivate the SMINC generalization (Selectivity of Modal Insertion in Non-finite Contexts): the covert modal only appears with plain infinitives.

Key Data (Table 1, p. 8) #

ComplementExamplePresup content
finite CP"forgot that she stopped"non-modal (she stopped)
PRO-ing gerund"forgot stopping by"non-modal (stopped)
plain infinitive"forgot to stop by"modal (was supposed to stop)

Uniform Factivity #

The paper follows @cite{white-2014} in arguing that forget is canonically factive in ALL uses — both the cognition reading ("forgot that p") and the psych-action reading ("forgot to VP"). There is no lexical ambiguity. What varies is the content of the presupposition, not its presence.

Whether a factive presupposition has modal content.

@cite{ippolito-kiss-williams-2026} shows that forget always presupposes, but the content varies by complement type:

  • .nonModal: directly presupposes complement truth
  • .modal: presupposes a modalized version (obligation/plan)
  • nonModal : PresupContent

    Directly presupposes complement truth: "forgot that p" → presupposes p

  • modal : PresupContent

    Presupposes a modalized version: "forgot to VP" → presupposes should VP

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      An empirical judgment about forget's presupposition in a particular complement frame.

      Every entry has a presupposition (uniform factivity); what varies is the content (modal vs. non-modal).

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Cognition reading (finite CP) #

          "Forgot that p" presupposes p (non-modal). This is the canonical factive reading recognized since @cite{kiparsky-kiparsky-1970}.

          @cite{ippolito-kiss-williams-2026}, ex. (1): "Ana forgot that she stopped by the flower shop." Presupposes: Ana stopped by the flower shop.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Cognition reading (PRO-ing gerund) #

            "Forgot V-ing" presupposes V-ing occurred (non-modal). This is the critical evidence against the Modalized Complement Analysis's overprediction: the gerund is non-finite but NOT modalized.

            @cite{ippolito-kiss-williams-2026}, ex. (12): "Ana forgot stopping by the flower shop." Presupposes: Ana stopped by the flower shop.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Psych-action reading (plain infinitive) #

              "Forgot to VP" presupposes a plan or obligation to VP (modal). Un@cite{ippolito-kiss-williams-2026}, this arises because the plain infinitive's forward-oriented temporal profile violates the pre-existence presupposition, triggering covert modal insertion.

              @cite{ippolito-kiss-williams-2026}, ex. (3): "Ana forgot to stop by the flower shop." Presupposes: Ana was supposed to / had a plan to stop.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                All forget judgments across complement frames.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Uniform factivity: forget has a presupposition in every frame. (All entries exist — there is no "absent presupposition" case.)

                  Not all presuppositions are modal: finite and gerund cases are non-modal.

                  Not all presuppositions are non-modal: the infinitival case is modal.

                  The modal presupposition arises with exactly one frame (the infinitival).