An allocutive Agree configuration: a probe (Fin or SA head) enters Agree with a null addressee DP bearing valued [iHON] and [person:2].
- probe : SyntacticObject
The probe (Fin or SA head)
- probeFeatures : FeatureBundle
Feature bundle on the probe (contains unvalued [uHON])
- addressee : SyntacticObject
The null addressee DP
- addresseeFeatures : FeatureBundle
Feature bundle on the addressee (valued [iHON], [person:2])
- probeCat : Cat
Category of the probe: Fin or SA
Instances For
Probe features for allocutive agreement: unvalued [uHON].
Equations
Instances For
Addressee DP features: valued [iHON] and [person:2]. The addressee is always 2nd person.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Predict embeddability from the category of the allocutive probe. SA → root-only (SAP does not embed), Fin → freely embeddable.
Equations
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.predictEmbeddability Minimalism.Cat.SA = Phenomena.Politeness.Honorifics.Embeddability.rootOnly
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.predictEmbeddability Minimalism.Cat.Fin = Phenomena.Politeness.Honorifics.Embeddability.freelyEmbed
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.predictEmbeddability x✝ = Phenomena.Politeness.Honorifics.Embeddability.limitedEmbed
Instances For
Probe-locus assignment for each language in the survey.
Equations
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.probeLocus "Souletian Basque" = Minimalism.Cat.SA
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.probeLocus "Korean" = Minimalism.Cat.SA
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.probeLocus "Japanese" = Minimalism.Cat.SA
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.probeLocus "Magahi" = Minimalism.Cat.Fin
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.probeLocus "Galician" = Minimalism.Cat.Fin
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.probeLocus "Hindi" = Minimalism.Cat.Fin
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.probeLocus "Maithili" = Minimalism.Cat.Fin
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.probeLocus "Tamil" = Minimalism.Cat.Fin
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.probeLocus "Punjabi" = Minimalism.Cat.Fin
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.probeLocus x✝ = Minimalism.Cat.C
Instances For
Check that the predicted embeddability matches the observed data (modulo limited-embed, which Fin subsumes).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All languages in the survey are correctly predicted by probe locus.
The [iHON] relation: encodes social hierarchy between speaker and referent. ⟦iHON⟧ = λx. S_i ≺ x, where ≺ is social ordering.
- speaker : E
The speaker
- referent : E
The referent (target of honorification)
- level : HonLevel
The honorific level determined by the relation
Instances For
HonP: a functional projection in the nominal spine that hosts [iHON]. Wraps a DP's SO with an honorific feature.
- dp : SyntacticObject
The underlying DP
- honFeature : GramFeature
The honorific feature on HonP
The feature must be a valued [iHON]
Instances For
Extract the honorific level from a HonP.
Equations
- hp.level = match hp.honFeature with | Minimalism.GramFeature.valued (Minimalism.FeatureVal.hon l) => l | x => Minimalism.HonLevel.nh
Instances For
AA validity reduces to validAgree: allocutive agreement is not special
machinery — it IS phi-agreement between a functional head and a null
addressee DP.
SA-based allocutive agreement is root-only. Follows directly from SAP being the highest phase.
Fin-based allocutive agreement is freely embeddable. FinP is below CP and embeds normally.
Basque prediction: probe = SA → root-only.
Magahi prediction: probe = Fin → freely embeddable.
Korean prediction: probe = SA (particle-based) → root-only.
[iHON] features match under Agree: probe [uHON] can be valued by goal [iHON], paralleling standard phi-agreement.
Honorific valuation via Agree: applying Agree to an allocutive probe with [uHON] against an addressee with [iHON] values the probe.
Bridge to Phenomena/Questions/Typology: SAP unembeddability parallels
sap_particles_not_in_quasi_sub. Both follow from SAP being the
speech-act layer that does not embed.
Connection: SA-based allocutive markers (particles) pattern with SAP-layer question particles — neither appears in quasi-subordination. This is a structural parallel, not an identity theorem.
Bridge to @cite{yoon-etal-2020} politeness: social utility (φ weighting informational vs social goals) is the pragmatic analogue of syntactic [iHON]. Both encode social relations between discourse participants.
[iHON] is syntactic: speaker ≺ referent in the grammar. Social utility is pragmatic: speaker optimizes face preservation. The parallel: honorific level increases ↔ social weight φ increases.
Convert register level to theory HonLevel. informal → non-honorific, neutral → honorific, formal → high-honorific.
Equations
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.levelToHonLevel Core.Register.Level.informal = Minimalism.HonLevel.nh
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.levelToHonLevel Core.Register.Level.neutral = Minimalism.HonLevel.h
- Minimalism.Phenomena.Allocutivity.levelToHonLevel Core.Register.Level.formal = Minimalism.HonLevel.hh
Instances For
Basque fragment has 2nd-person pronouns.
Magahi fragment has three honorific levels.
Korean fragment has 2nd-person pronouns.
Japanese fragment has 2nd-person pronouns.
Tamil fragment has 2nd-person pronouns.
Galician fragment has 2nd-person pronouns.
Hindi fragment has three honorific levels.
Maithili fragment has three honorific levels.
Punjabi fragment has 2nd-person pronouns.
Register bridge: informal maps to non-honorific.
Register bridge: neutral maps to honorific.
Register bridge: formal maps to high-honorific.