Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Politeness.Studies.AlokBhalla2026

An allocutive Agree configuration: a probe (Fin or SA head) enters Agree with a null addressee DP bearing valued [iHON] and [person:2].

  • The probe (Fin or SA head)

  • probeFeatures : FeatureBundle

    Feature bundle on the probe (contains unvalued [uHON])

  • addressee : SyntacticObject

    The null addressee DP

  • addresseeFeatures : FeatureBundle

    Feature bundle on the addressee (valued [iHON], [person:2])

  • probeCat : Cat

    Category of the probe: Fin or SA

Instances For

    Addressee DP features: valued [iHON] and [person:2]. The addressee is always 2nd person.

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Check that the predicted embeddability matches the observed data (modulo limited-embed, which Fin subsumes).

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        The [iHON] relation: encodes social hierarchy between speaker and referent. ⟦iHON⟧ = λx. S_i ≺ x, where ≺ is social ordering.

        • speaker : E

          The speaker

        • referent : E

          The referent (target of honorification)

        • level : HonLevel

          The honorific level determined by the relation

        Instances For

          HonP: a functional projection in the nominal spine that hosts [iHON]. Wraps a DP's SO with an honorific feature.

          Instances For

            Extract the honorific level from a HonP.

            Equations
            Instances For

              AA validity reduces to validAgree: allocutive agreement is not special machinery — it IS phi-agreement between a functional head and a null addressee DP.

              SA-based allocutive agreement is root-only. Follows directly from SAP being the highest phase.

              Fin-based allocutive agreement is freely embeddable. FinP is below CP and embeds normally.

              [iHON] features match under Agree: probe [uHON] can be valued by goal [iHON], paralleling standard phi-agreement.

              Honorific valuation via Agree: applying Agree to an allocutive probe with [uHON] against an addressee with [iHON] values the probe.

              Bridge to Phenomena/Questions/Typology: SAP unembeddability parallels sap_particles_not_in_quasi_sub. Both follow from SAP being the speech-act layer that does not embed.

              Connection: SA-based allocutive markers (particles) pattern with SAP-layer question particles — neither appears in quasi-subordination. This is a structural parallel, not an identity theorem.

              Bridge to @cite{yoon-etal-2020} politeness: social utility (φ weighting informational vs social goals) is the pragmatic analogue of syntactic [iHON]. Both encode social relations between discourse participants.

              [iHON] is syntactic: speaker ≺ referent in the grammar. Social utility is pragmatic: speaker optimizes face preservation. The parallel: honorific level increases ↔ social weight φ increases.