Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Plurals.Multiplicity

Multiplicity Inferences: Empirical Data #

Theory-neutral empirical patterns for multiplicity inferences — the observation that bare plurals trigger a "more than one" reading in upward-entailing contexts but not in downward-entailing contexts.

The Puzzle #

This monotonicity sensitivity parallels classical scalar implicatures (e.g., "some" → "not all" in UE but not DE contexts).

Theoretical Approaches #

Three main accounts:

  1. Ambiguity (@cite{farkas-de-swart-2010}): Plural is ambiguous (inclusive "one or more" vs exclusive "more than one"), resolved by Strongest Meaning Hypothesis.
  2. Implicature (@cite{sauerland-2003}, @cite{spector-2007}, @cite{zweig-2009}): Plural literally means "one or more," multiplicity arises as a scalar implicature with the singular as alternative.
  3. Homogeneity (@cite{kriz-2015}): Plural interpretation via homogeneity presupposition.

Key References #

A multiplicity inference datum: a bare plural sentence tested in upward-entailing (positive) and downward-entailing (negative) contexts.

  • positiveSentence : String

    The bare plural sentence (positive form)

  • negativeSentence : String

    The negated form

  • multiplicityInPositive : Bool

    Does the "more than one" inference arise in the positive?

  • multiplicityInNegative : Bool

    Does the "more than one" inference arise in the negative?

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Core example: "Emily fed giraffes."

      In UE: interpreted as "Emily fed more than one giraffe." In DE: "Emily didn't feed giraffes" ≈ "Emily didn't feed any giraffes."

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Conditional antecedent (DE context).

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Multiplicity arises in UE but not DE — the core monotonicity pattern.

          The monotonicity sensitivity of multiplicity inferences parallels that of classical scalar implicatures. This structure captures the parallel.

          • weakTerm : String

            The scalar term (e.g., "some", bare plural)

          • strongAlternative : String

            Its stronger alternative (e.g., "all", singular)

          • inferenceInUE : String

            Inference in UE context

          • arisesInUE : Bool

            Does inference arise in UE?

          • arisesInDE : Bool

            Does inference arise in DE?

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Some/all parallel.

              Equations
              Instances For

                Plural/singular parallel.

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Or/and parallel.

                  Equations
                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      All three scales show the same monotonicity pattern.

                      Competing theoretical approaches to multiplicity inferences.

                      • ambiguity : PluralTheory

                        Plural is ambiguous; Strongest Meaning Hypothesis resolves.

                      • implicature : PluralTheory

                        Plural literally means "one or more"; multiplicity is implicature.

                      • homogeneity : PluralTheory

                        Plural interpretation via homogeneity presupposition.

                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Key predictions where the three theories diverge.

                          • theory : PluralTheory

                            The theory

                          • childrenComputeFewer : Bool

                            Does it predict children compute fewer multiplicity inferences?

                          • multiplicityCorrelatesWithSI : Bool

                            Does it predict multiplicity rates correlate with SI rates?

                          • accountsForPolarityAsymmetry : Bool

                            Can it account for asymmetric polarity pattern in children?

                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For
                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For
                                Equations
                                Instances For

                                  Positive vs negative plural sentences in singular contexts.

                                  In a context where only one giraffe was fed:

                                  • "Emily fed giraffes" is literally true (one or more) but carries a false multiplicity implicature → intermediate status (true but misleading)
                                  • "Emily didn't feed giraffes" is literally false → clearly false

                                  The three theories predict:

                                  • Ambiguity: both undefined (homogeneous gap) or both false → same status
                                  • Homogeneity: both undefined → same status
                                  • Implicature: positive = true with false implicature, negative = false → different
                                  • theory : PluralTheory

                                    The theory

                                  • positiveNegativeDiffer : Bool

                                    Does positive get different status from negative?

                                  Instances For
                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For
                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For
                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          Only the implicature approach predicts different status for positive vs negative in singular contexts.

                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For
                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For
                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For
                                                Equations
                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                Instances For