@cite{huang-snedeker-2013} — Covered-Box Paradigm #
@cite{huang-snedeker-2013} @cite{musolino-2004} @cite{wynn-1992}
"What Exactly do Numbers Mean?" Language Learning and Development 9(2): 105-129
Design #
The covered-box task cancels scalar implicatures by embedding the target term in a definite description ("the box with two fish") and providing three options: a visible mismatch, a visible lower-bounded match, and a covered (hidden) box. When no exact match is visible, choosing the covered box implies the participant requires an exact match (rejecting the LB-compatible visible option).
The task is validated by a scalar control: "some" in the same paradigm yields lower-bounded readings (adults accept ALL as "some"), confirming that implicatures are successfully cancelled.
Key Empirical Findings #
Across 4 experiments with adults and two-knower children (ages 2;6–3;7):
- "some" control: lower-bounded when implicature cancelled — adults accept the total set (87% Exp 1, 60% Exp 4), children accept it (83–90%)
- "two" critical: exact under the same conditions — both adults (92–100%) and two-knowers (80–95%) reject the 3-fish box, choose covered
- Scalar–numeral divergence: "some" and "two" pattern differently in the same implicature-cancelling context; scalars go LB, numerals stay exact
- Two-knower specificity: children who know "one" and "two" but NOT "three" still give exact readings for "two"
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Knower level in the @cite{wynn-1992} acquisition sequence.
An empirical classification: children master numeral meanings one at a time. A two-knower gives 1 for "one", 2 for "two", and random handfuls for higher numbers in the Give-N task.
- oneKnower : KnowerLevel
- twoKnower : KnowerLevel
- threeKnower : KnowerLevel
- cpKnower : KnowerLevel
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Whether a child at a given knower level knows the meaning of a numeral.
Equations
- Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.knowsNumeral Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.KnowerLevel.oneKnower 1 = true
- Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.knowsNumeral Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.KnowerLevel.twoKnower 1 = true
- Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.knowsNumeral Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.KnowerLevel.twoKnower 2 = true
- Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.knowsNumeral Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.KnowerLevel.threeKnower 1 = true
- Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.knowsNumeral Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.KnowerLevel.threeKnower 2 = true
- Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.knowsNumeral Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.KnowerLevel.threeKnower 3 = true
- Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.knowsNumeral Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.KnowerLevel.cpKnower x✝ = true
- Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.HuangSpelkeSnedeker2013.knowsNumeral x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Two-knowers know "two" but not "three". This is the empirical fact that makes their exact "two" readings informative: they cannot have derived exactness via scalar implicature against "three".