@cite{claus-walch-2024}: Evaluative Valence Distinguishes "at most" from "up to" #
@cite{blok-2015} @cite{claus-walch-2024} @cite{kennedy-2015}
Empirical data from two experiments showing that "at most" and "up to" have identical truth conditions but divergent framing effects due to evaluative valence.
Experiment 1: Truth-Value Judgments #
Participants evaluated sentences like "The battery lasts {exactly / at most / up to} 100 hours" against actual values. Key finding: "at most 100" and "up to 100" have the same truth conditions (accepted when actual ≤ 100), confirming they are both Class B upper-bound modifiers.
Experiment 2: Framing Effects #
Participants evaluated modified numeral sentences in positive vs negative frames. Key findings:
- "exactly": standard framing (higher endorsement in positive contexts)
- "up to": standard framing (higher endorsement in positive contexts)
- "at most": REVERSED framing (higher endorsement in NEGATIVE contexts)
This reversal is predicted by @cite{blok-2015}'s evaluative valence distinction:
- "at most" carries negative evaluative valence → endorsed in negative contexts
- "up to" carries positive evaluative valence → endorsed in positive contexts
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Framing condition in Experiment 2.
- standard : FramingCondition
- reversed : FramingCondition
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Truth-value judgment in Experiment 1.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.ClausWalch2024.instBEqExp1Datum.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Experiment 1 data: "exactly 100"
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Experiment 1 data: "at most 100" — accepted iff actual ≤ 100
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Experiment 1 data: "up to 100" — accepted iff actual ≤ 100
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All Experiment 1 data.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A datum from Experiment 2: endorsement rate for a modifier under a framing condition. Rates are on [0,1] scale.
- modifier : Modifier
- framingCondition : FramingCondition
- endorsementRate : ℚ
Endorsement rate (proportion of participants who endorsed)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Phenomena.Numerals.Studies.ClausWalch2024.instBEqExp2Datum.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
"exactly" in standard (positive) framing: high endorsement.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"exactly" in reversed (negative) framing: lower endorsement.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"up to" in standard (positive) framing: high endorsement.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"up to" in reversed (negative) framing: lower endorsement.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"at most" in standard (positive) framing: LOWER endorsement (reversed!).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"at most" in reversed (negative) framing: HIGHER endorsement.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All Experiment 2 data.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"at most" and "up to" agree on all truth-value judgments.
Both are accepted when actual ≤ numeral, rejected when actual > numeral. This confirms they are both Class B upper-bound modifiers.
"at most" shows REVERSED framing: higher endorsement in negative context.
This is the key empirical finding of @cite{claus-walch-2024}.
"up to" shows STANDARD framing: higher endorsement in positive context.
"exactly" shows standard framing: higher endorsement in positive context.
"at most" and "up to" DIVERGE on framing direction despite same truth conditions.
This is the central result: evaluative valence, not truth conditions, determines framing behavior.