Numeral Embedding Test Cases #
@cite{bylinina-nouwen-2020} @cite{coppock-beaver-2014} @cite{gajewski-2007} @cite{horn-1972} @cite{kaufmann-2012} @cite{kennedy-2015} @cite{kiparsky-kiparsky-1970} @cite{meier-2003} @cite{musolino-2004} @cite{nouwen-2006} @cite{penka-2006} @cite{solt-waldon-2019}
Theory-neutral empirical test cases for bare numerals in embedding environments (negation, modals, attitudes, conditionals, DE contexts). These environments are where lower-bound and bilateral numeral theories diverge most sharply.
Key Diagnostic Environments #
- Negation: "John doesn't have three children" — LB predicts <3, BL predicts ≠3
- Modals: "You must read three books" — □(≥3) vs □(=3)
- "Exactly" redundancy: informative under LB, redundant under BL
- Conditionals: "If you have three children..." — ≥3 vs =3 as trigger condition
- Existential scope: embedded EXH blocked under existential quantifier
Type of embedding environment for numeral test cases.
- negation : EmbeddingType
- modal_possibility : EmbeddingType
- modal_necessity : EmbeddingType
- attitude : EmbeddingType
- conditional : EmbeddingType
- restrictor : EmbeddingType
- question : EmbeddingType
- existential_scope : EmbeddingType
- exactly_modification : EmbeddingType
- collective : EmbeddingType
- focus_only : EmbeddingType
- factive : EmbeddingType
- imperative : EmbeddingType
- neg_raising : EmbeddingType
- approximator : EmbeddingType
- degree : EmbeddingType
- convexity_test : EmbeddingType
- acquisition : EmbeddingType
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Numerals.Embedding.instBEqEmbeddingType.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
A theory-neutral test case for a numeral in an embedding environment.
Each datum records the sentence, what reading each theory predicts, and (when clear) which reading speakers prefer.
- sentence : String
- embedding : EmbeddingType
- numeral : Nat
- lowerBoundReading : String
- bilateralReading : String
- source : String
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Phenomena.Numerals.Embedding.instBEqNumeralEmbeddingDatum.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
"John doesn't have three children" — the classic divergence case. LB: has fewer than 3. BL: doesn't have exactly 3 (could have more).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Sentential negation — same divergence, more formal register.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Metalinguistic negation — supports only ≠3, not <3. "He doesn't have THREE children — he has four" is felicitous.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"You are allowed to eat two biscuits" — modal possibility. Key interaction: EXH scope relative to modal.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"You must read three books" — modal necessity. Necessity quantifies universally over accessible worlds.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"John has exactly three children" — redundancy test. Informative under LB (restricts ≥3 to =3), redundant under BL (=3 already).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"John believes there are three solutions" — attitude embedding.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"If you have three children, you qualify for the tax credit" — numeral in conditional antecedent (downward-entailing context).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"Every student who read three books passed" — numeral in restrictor of universal (downward-entailing).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"Did John read three books?" — numeral in polar question.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"Some students answered three questions correctly" — numeral embedded under existential (@cite{bylinina-nouwen-2020} (38)–(39)). Embedded EXH is blocked in this environment under LB.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"Twelve dots surround the square" — collective predicate. Collective reading requires the group to be exactly 12.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"Almost three students passed" — the polar orientation diagnostic. "Almost" has a proximal component (close to p) and a polar component (¬p) (@cite{nouwen-2006}). Under LB, the polar component ¬(≥3) restricts to <3 (below only). Under BL, ¬(=3) admits values above AND below (2 or 4). The empirical asymmetry (below only) is argued by @cite{penka-2006} to favor LB. @cite{nouwen-2006} shows that polar orientation is in general context-dependent (e.g., "almost that warm" vs "almost that cold" orient in opposite directions).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"Only three students passed" — focus particle + numeral. Under LB, "only" is truth-conditionally informative (adds upper bound ≥3 → =3). Under BL, "only" is truth-conditionally redundant (=3 already exact) but contributes an evaluative scalar presupposition ("3 is low").
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"I'm surprised that three students passed" — emotive factive. The numeral is under a factive presupposition trigger: LB presupposes ≥3 passed, BL presupposes =3 passed. If 5 passed, LB presupposition is satisfied but BL is violated.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"Read three books!" — imperative compliance condition. Does reading 5 books comply with the command? Under LB: yes (5 ≥ 3). Under BL: no (5 ≠ 3).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"I doubt that three students passed" — neg-raising verb. "Doubt" ≈ "believe not" (neg-raising). Under LB: think ¬(≥3) = think <3 passed. Under BL: think ¬(=3) = think ≠3 (could think 5 passed).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"She doesn't have 40 sheep" — QUD-convexity diagnostic. Infelicitous in neutral "how many?" context. Under LB: ¬(≥40) = {0.39}, a convex set → predicts felicitous (wrong). Under BL: ¬(=40) = {0.39, 41, 42,...}, non-convex → predicts infelicitous (correct).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"Two of the horses jumped over the fence" — child interpretation. When 3 horses jumped, 5-year-olds reject "two horses jumped." Under LB: 3 ≥ 2, so should be accepted (children don't compute SI). Under BL: 3 ≠ 2, so should be rejected (exact reading is semantic). Children reject → supports BL.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
"Three students is too many" — degree construction monotonicity. Under LB: ≥3 is too many → 4 is also too many (upward monotone). Under BL: =3 is too many → 4 being too many is NOT entailed.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All embedding test cases.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
20 test cases covering 18 embedding types.
A generalization about numeral behavior across embedding environments.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Key cross-cutting generalizations from the literature.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.