Denial in Discourse #
@cite{van-der-sandt-maier-2003}
Theory-neutral empirical data on denial: how correction sequences selectively retract different content layers of the denied sentence.
Central Claim: Denial ≠ Negation #
@cite{van-der-sandt-maier-2003} argue that denial and negation are orthogonal concepts:
- Negation is a semantic operator (a logical connective on propositions)
- Denial is a discourse operation (non-monotonic correction of contextual information)
A denial can use a POSITIVE sentence: "Mary IS happy" denies "Mary is unhappy" (§2.1, ex. 6). And a negative sentence can be a plain assertion, not a denial: "Mary is unhappy" uttered in isolation (§2.1, ex. 2). What makes something a denial is its discourse function (correcting prior information), not its syntactic form.
Three Denial Types #
When denial DOES use negation, the correction determines which content layer is retracted:
| Denial type | Layer targeted | Paper example |
|---|---|---|
| Propositional | fr (at-issue) | "Mary is NOT happy" (5) |
| Presuppositional | pr | "...NOT bald — there is no king" (30b) |
| Implicature | imp | "Not POSSIBLE — NECESSARY" (29b) |
The paper also identifies a fourth empirical category — register/
connotation denials like "not a steed — a horse" (14) and "didn't kick the
bucket — passed away" (15) — which maps to the imp layer alongside
scalar implicature.
Scope #
This module captures theory-neutral denial data and the DenialType → ContentLayer mapping. The directed reverse anaphora (RA*) mechanism
is formalized in Theories.Semantics.Dynamic.DRT.Basic (LDRS.directedRA),
with worked examples and Off→DenialDatum agreement proofs in
Phenomena.Negation.Studies.VanDerSandtMaier2003.
The type of denial, determined by which content layer is targeted.
Each type corresponds to a ContentLayer via targetLayer. This
is the central claim of: the different
denial types are not different operations, but one mechanism
(non-monotonic discourse correction) targeting different layers.
- propositional : DenialType
Propositional denial: targets at-issue content. The presupposition survives; the assertion is retracted. (5): "Mary is not happy." (8): "The king of France is not bald — he has a full head of hair."
- presuppositional : DenialType
Presuppositional denial: targets presupposed content. The presupposition is retracted; the assertion falls with it. (30b): "The king of France is not bald — France does not have a king." (10): "John did not stop smoking — he never smoked."
- implicature : DenialType
Implicature denial: targets enrichment beyond truth conditions. Literal meaning survives; the implicature or connotation is retracted. (29b): "It's not POSSIBLE — it's NECESSARY." (14): "That is not a steed — it's a horse."
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Negation.Denial.instBEqDenialType.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Map denial type to the content layer it targets.
Equations
- Phenomena.Negation.Denial.DenialType.propositional.targetLayer = Core.Semantics.ContentLayer.ContentLayer.atIssue
- Phenomena.Negation.Denial.DenialType.presuppositional.targetLayer = Core.Semantics.ContentLayer.ContentLayer.presupposition
- Phenomena.Negation.Denial.DenialType.implicature.targetLayer = Core.Semantics.ContentLayer.ContentLayer.implicature
Instances For
Each denial type targets a distinct layer.
The mapping from denial types to content layers is injective: no two denial types target the same layer.
A denial datum: an assertion-denial-correction triple.
Records the empirical pattern where a speaker asserts S, a hearer denies with a correction C, and the denial selectively retracts one content layer while preserving others.
Note: denial and correction may be the same sentence in positive
denials (where the correcting utterance is itself affirmative).
- assertion : String
The original assertion being denied
- denial : String
The denial utterance (may be negative or positive)
- correction : String
The correction that follows or constitutes the denial
- denialType : DenialType
Which content layer the correction targets
- retractedContent : String
What content is retracted by the denial
- survivingContent : String
What content survives the denial
- exampleNum : String
Paper example number, if from
- notes : String
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Positive denial: denial does not require negation.
§2.1, ex. 6: "Mary IS happy" can deny "Mary is unhappy." The correcting utterance is syntactically positive. This demonstrates the paper's central architectural claim: denial is a discourse operation (non-monotonic correction), not a syntactic one (negation).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Propositional denial: negation targets the assertion (at-issue content). §2.2, ex. 5.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Presuppositional denial of the king of France. §2.4, ex. 30b.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Presuppositional denial of "stop" (prior-state presupposition). §2.2, ex. 10.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Presuppositional denial of "know" (factive presupposition). §2.2, ex. 9.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Scalar implicature denial: "possible" implicates "not necessary." §2.2, ex. 11 / §2.4, ex. 29b.
"Possible" literally means ◇p; the scalar implicature is ¬□p (not necessary). The correction "it is necessary" retracts the implicature while preserving the literal meaning (□p entails ◇p).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Scalar implicature denial with "several." §2.3, ex. 21.
"Several" implicates "not all." The correction "all" retracts the upper-bound implicature.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Gradable adjective implicature denial: "good" implicates "not excellent." §2.2, ex. 12.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Connotation denial: "lady" connotes a social role beyond "woman/wife." §2.2, ex. 13.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Register denial: "steed" connotes formality/literary register. §2.2, ex. 14.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The same surface negation can correspond to different denial types, disambiguated by the correction. The paper's §2.3 example (19)/(20) demonstrates this with "still":
- (19) "John does NOT still live in Paris — he did live there but has moved"
= propositional denial (targets
fr: "John lives in Paris now") - (20) "John does NOT still live in Paris — he has never set foot in France"
= presuppositional denial (targets
pr: "John lived in Paris before")
Propositional reading of "still" denial. §2.3, ex. 19.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Presuppositional reading of "still" denial. §2.3, ex. 20.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Same surface negation, different denial types.
But they target different layers.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.