Empirical pattern: Free choice permission.
"You may have coffee or tea" pragmatically implies: "You may have coffee AND you may have tea"
This is not a semantic entailment:
- Semantically: ◇(C∨T) ↔ ◇C ∨ ◇T
- Pragmatically: ◇(C∨T) → ◇C ∧ ◇T
- permission : String
The permission statement
- disjunctA : String
The disjuncts
- disjunctB : String
- inference : String
The inferred free choice reading
- isSemanticEntailment : Bool
Is this a semantic entailment?
- isPragmaticInference : Bool
Is this a pragmatic inference?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Classic free choice example. Source: @cite{ross-1944}, @cite{kamp-1973}
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Free choice with activities. Source: @cite{kamp-1973}
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Free choice with locations.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All basic free choice examples.
Equations
Instances For
Ross's Paradox: The puzzle that motivated free choice research.
From "Post the letter" we can infer "Post the letter or burn it" (by or-introduction). But intuitively, permission to post doesn't give permission to burn!
Source: @cite{ross-1944}
- original : String
The original imperative/permission
- derived : String
The derived statement (by or-intro)
- semanticallyValid : Bool
Is the derivation semantically valid?
- pragmaticallyFelicitous : Bool
Is the derivation pragmatically felicitous?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Classic Ross's paradox example. Source: @cite{ross-1944}
Equations
Instances For
Ross's paradox with permission.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All Ross's paradox examples.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Deontic permission (classic case). Source: @cite{kamp-1973}
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Epistemic possibility. Source: @cite{zimmermann-2000}
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Ability modal.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All modal free choice examples.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Explicit cancellation of free choice.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Cancellation by context.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Free Choice Any #
Universal free choice items (FCIs) like any exhibit similar inference patterns to disjunctive free choice but involve universal quantification.
"You may take any class" pragmatically implies:
- You may take Syntax (specifically)
- You may take Phonology (specifically)
- You may take Semantics (specifically) -... (for all classes)
This is the exclusiveness inference: permission applies to each individual alternative, not just to "some class or other".
Key difference from disjunction:
- Disjunction: ◇(a ∨ b) → ◇a ∧ ◇b
- Universal FCI: ◇(∃x.class(x)) → ∀x.class(x) → ◇take(x)
Empirical pattern: Free choice any (universal FCI).
"You may take any class" pragmatically implies permission for each specific class. This is the exclusiveness inference, distinct from simple existential permission.
- sentence : String
The sentence with any
- domain : String
The domain of quantification
Example domain elements
- inference : String
The inferred reading
- exclusivenessArises : Bool
Does exclusiveness inference arise?
- robustToPriors : Bool
Is this inference robust to prior manipulation?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Free choice any with classes. Source: @cite{alsop-2024}
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Free choice any with fruits (simplified domain). Source: Based on @cite{kadmon-landman-1993}
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Free choice any with locations.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Both derive free choice/exclusiveness inferences.
Equations
- Phenomena.Modality.FreeChoice.bothDeriveFC = { aspect := "Core inference", disjunctionFC := "◇(a ∨ b) → ◇a ∧ ◇b", universalFC := "◇(∃x.P(x)) → ∀x.P(x) → ◇x", analogous := true }
Instances For
Both are robust to prior manipulation.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Different quantificational structure.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All FC comparison data.
Equations
Instances For
FC with Anaphora: Bathroom Disjunctions #
@cite{elliott-sudo-2025} identify a novel FC pattern where cross-disjunct anaphora interacts with Free Choice:
"Either there's no bathroom or it's in a funny place"
Inference:
- ◇(there's no bathroom)
- ◇(there's a bathroom ∧ it's in a funny place)
The pronoun "it" in the second disjunct is bound by the existential in the negated first disjunct. This is puzzling because negation should block binding, yet the inference requires x to be accessible.
Bathroom disjunction: FC with cross-disjunct anaphora.
- sentence : String
The sentence
- disjunct1 : String
First disjunct (typically negated existential)
- disjunct2 : String
Second disjunct (with anaphoric element)
- anaphor : String
The anaphoric element
- antecedent : String
The antecedent (under negation)
- inference1 : String
First FC inference
- inference2 : String
Second FC inference (with anaphora resolved)
- hasCrossDisjunctAnaphora : Bool
Does cross-disjunct anaphora occur?
- source : String
Source
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Classic bathroom disjunction. Source: @cite{elliott-sudo-2025}
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Bathroom variant with "the bathroom".
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Similar pattern with different content.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Negated universal variant.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All bathroom disjunction examples.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Standard FC: no anaphora.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Standard FC with independent disjuncts.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All standard FC examples (contrast with bathroom).