Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.ImplicitCausality.Studies.SolstadBott2024.Data

Implicit Causality Data for Psych Verbs #

@cite{solstad-bott-2022} @cite{solstad-bott-2024}

Theory-neutral experimental data on implicit causality (I-Caus) and implicit consequentiality (I-Cons) for psych verbs. The experimental data comes from @cite{solstad-bott-2022}, which tests stimulus-experiencer (STIM-EXP) and experiencer-stimulus (EXP-STIM) verb classes in German.

The theoretical framework connecting occasion verbs, projectivity, and IC bias comes from @cite{solstad-bott-2024}.

Verb classes #

Key empirical findings #

  1. Exp 1 (sentence continuation): I-Caus and I-Cons biases mirror each other for psych verbs. STIM-EXP: 87.4% NP1 with weil; EXP-STIM: 96% NP2 with weil.
  2. Exp 2 (coherence relations): Explanations dominate over consequences for both classes; consequence rate differs by class.
  3. Exp 3 (forced coreference): Asymmetry Hypothesis confirmed — even bias-incongruent continuations produce explanations.
  4. Exp 4 (explanation types): Explanations and consequences are of the types predicted by the Two-Mechanism Account.

Verb classes from the IC bias literature.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Implicit causality bias direction.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Connective conditions in @cite{solstad-bott-2022}. German connectives weil (because) and sodass (and so).

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Subject coreference proportion from Exp 1, Table 1 of @cite{solstad-bott-2022}. These are real data from 52 German participants with 20 STIM-EXP and 20 EXP-STIM verbs (gefallen excluded).

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For
                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          I-Cons (sodass): Biases mirror I-Caus — StimExp → NP2, ExpStim → NP1. (@cite{solstad-bott-2022}, §2.3: "almost perfect negative correlation" r = −0.94)

                          The Asymmetry Hypothesis: I-Caus and I-Cons derive from different mechanisms:

                          • I-Caus: verb-semantic (Empty Slot Theory)
                          • I-Cons: discourse-structural (Contiguity Principle)