@cite{nickel-2009}: Generics and the Ways of Normality #
Bernhard Nickel, "Generics and the Ways of Normality", Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (2009), 629–648.
The Problem: Conjunctive Generics #
Nickel criticizes majority-based views of generics (including @cite{cohen-1999a}'s probability-based GEN) by showing they cannot handle conjunctive generics like:
(1) Elephants live in Africa and Asia.
If (1) is equivalent to the sentential conjunction:
(2) Elephants live in Africa AND Elephants live in Asia.
then a majority-based view would require both conjuncts to hold with prevalence > 0.5 over the same domain. But African elephants and Asian elephants are disjoint populations — most elephants can't live in BOTH places. So the majority view predicts (1) is false, contrary to speaker judgments.
Nickel's Solution: Ways of Being Normal #
Nickel proposes that normality is not a single binary predicate but comes in multiple ways. For the elephant case:
- Way w₁: normal w.r.t. habitat → lives in Africa
- Way w₂: normal w.r.t. habitat → lives in Asia
GEN existentially quantifies over ways of being normal, then universally quantifies over entities that are normal in that way:
GEN[A][F] is true iff
∃w (way of being normal for As w.r.t. F).
∀x. normalIn(x, w) → F(x)
Conjunctive generics can then use different normality ways for each conjunct:
(1) is true iff
(∃w₁. ∀x. normalIn(x, w₁) → livesInAfrica(x)) ∧
(∃w₂. ∀x. normalIn(x, w₂) → livesInAsia(x))
This is discussed in the introduction to Genericity (OUP 2013).
A way of being normal — an index that selects which entities count as "normal" for a given generalization. Different generic claims can appeal to different normality ways.
- id : ℕ
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Generics.Studies.Nickel2009.instBEqNormalcyWay.beq { id := a } { id := b } = (a == b)
- Phenomena.Generics.Studies.Nickel2009.instBEqNormalcyWay.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Phenomena.Generics.Studies.Nickel2009.instBEqEntity.beq { id := a } { id := b } = (a == b)
- Phenomena.Generics.Studies.Nickel2009.instBEqEntity.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Whether an entity is normal in a given way.
Equations
Instances For
A property of entities.
Equations
Instances For
Nickel's GEN with way-indexed normality:
GEN[restrictor][scope] is true iff there exists a way of being normal such that all entities that are normal in that way AND satisfy the restrictor also satisfy the scope.
The key innovation: the existential quantification over normality ways allows different conjuncts of a conjunctive generic to use different ways.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Conjunctive generic: both GEN[A][F₁] and GEN[A][F₂] hold, potentially via different normality ways.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Majority-based GEN (@cite{cohen-1999a}'s view): generic is true iff
prevalence exceeds 1/2. Structurally identical to cohenGEN in
Cohen1999.lean — both are thresholdGeneric with θ = 1/2, just
instantiated at different domain types (Entity here, Situation there).
Equations
- Phenomena.Generics.Studies.Nickel2009.majorityGEN entities restrictor scope = Semantics.Lexical.Noun.Kind.Generics.thresholdGeneric entities restrictor scope (1 / 2)
Instances For
10 elephants: 6 African (ids 0-5), 4 Asian (ids 6-9).
Equations
- Phenomena.Generics.Studies.Nickel2009.elephants = List.map (fun (n : ℕ) => { id := n }) (List.range 10)
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Normal in the "African way" = African elephants; Normal in the "Asian way" = Asian elephants.
Equations
Instances For
20 bears across 4 continents: North America (0-4), South America (5-9), Europe (10-14), Asia (15-19). The majority view fails for ALL four habitat conjuncts since each subpopulation is only 5/20 = 25%.
Equations
- Phenomena.Generics.Studies.Nickel2009.bears = List.map (fun (n : ℕ) => { id := n }) (List.range 20)
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Normality ways are pairwise incompatible: no entity in the domain is normal in two distinct ways simultaneously. The paper (p.643) states: "Being F-normal in one way is (perhaps always) incompatible with being F-normal in any other way."
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The majority view fails for the elephant example: "Elephants live in Asia" is false under majority semantics because only 4/10 < 1/2 are Asian.
The conjunctive generic fails under the majority view.
Nickel's view succeeds for the elephant conjunction.
The bears example (paper's ex. 2a): majority view fails for ALL four habitat conjuncts (each is 25%), while Nickel's view succeeds.
Normality ways are pairwise incompatible in both examples.
Nickel's GEN with a single normality way reduces to traditional GEN: if there is only one way of being normal, the existential quantification is trivial and we get back ∀x. normal(x) ∧ restrictor(x) → scope(x).
Summary: Three Views of Normality #
| View | Normality | GEN formula | Handles elephants? |
|---|---|---|---|
| @cite{cohen-1999a} | Probability > 0.5 | P(Q|P) > 0.5 | No |
| @cite{asher-pelletier-2012} | Modal ordering | ∀w ≤ w₀. P(x,w) → Q(x,w) | Partially |
| @cite{nickel-2009} | Ways of being normal | ∃w. ∀x. normal(x,w) → Q(x) | Yes |
The three views are formalized in:
Cohen1999.lean(probability)Comparisons/GenericModality.lean(modal)- This file (way-indexed normality)