Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Generics.Studies.Nickel2009

@cite{nickel-2009}: Generics and the Ways of Normality #

Bernhard Nickel, "Generics and the Ways of Normality", Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (2009), 629–648.

The Problem: Conjunctive Generics #

Nickel criticizes majority-based views of generics (including @cite{cohen-1999a}'s probability-based GEN) by showing they cannot handle conjunctive generics like:

(1) Elephants live in Africa and Asia.

If (1) is equivalent to the sentential conjunction:

(2) Elephants live in Africa AND Elephants live in Asia.

then a majority-based view would require both conjuncts to hold with prevalence > 0.5 over the same domain. But African elephants and Asian elephants are disjoint populations — most elephants can't live in BOTH places. So the majority view predicts (1) is false, contrary to speaker judgments.

Nickel's Solution: Ways of Being Normal #

Nickel proposes that normality is not a single binary predicate but comes in multiple ways. For the elephant case:

GEN existentially quantifies over ways of being normal, then universally quantifies over entities that are normal in that way:

GEN[A][F] is true iff
∃w (way of being normal for As w.r.t. F).
  ∀x. normalIn(x, w) → F(x)

Conjunctive generics can then use different normality ways for each conjunct:

(1) is true iff
(∃w₁. ∀x. normalIn(x, w₁) → livesInAfrica(x)) ∧
(∃w₂. ∀x. normalIn(x, w₂) → livesInAsia(x))

This is discussed in the introduction to Genericity (OUP 2013).

A way of being normal — an index that selects which entities count as "normal" for a given generalization. Different generic claims can appeal to different normality ways.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      An entity in the domain of a generic.

      Instances For
        Equations
        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For
            def Phenomena.Generics.Studies.Nickel2009.nickelGEN (entities : List Entity) (normalIn : NormalIn) (ways : List NormalcyWay) (restrictor scope : Property) :

            Nickel's GEN with way-indexed normality:

            GEN[restrictor][scope] is true iff there exists a way of being normal such that all entities that are normal in that way AND satisfy the restrictor also satisfy the scope.

            The key innovation: the existential quantification over normality ways allows different conjuncts of a conjunctive generic to use different ways.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For
              def Phenomena.Generics.Studies.Nickel2009.nickelConjunctiveGEN (entities : List Entity) (normalIn : NormalIn) (ways : List NormalcyWay) (restrictor scope1 scope2 : Property) :

              Conjunctive generic: both GEN[A][F₁] and GEN[A][F₂] hold, potentially via different normality ways.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Majority-based GEN (@cite{cohen-1999a}'s view): generic is true iff prevalence exceeds 1/2. Structurally identical to cohenGEN in Cohen1999.lean — both are thresholdGeneric with θ = 1/2, just instantiated at different domain types (Entity here, Situation there).

                Equations
                Instances For

                  10 elephants: 6 African (ids 0-5), 4 Asian (ids 6-9).

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    Normal in the "African way" = African elephants; Normal in the "Asian way" = Asian elephants.

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      20 bears across 4 continents: North America (0-4), South America (5-9), Europe (10-14), Asia (15-19). The majority view fails for ALL four habitat conjuncts since each subpopulation is only 5/20 = 25%.

                      Equations
                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For
                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            Normality ways are pairwise incompatible: no entity in the domain is normal in two distinct ways simultaneously. The paper (p.643) states: "Being F-normal in one way is (perhaps always) incompatible with being F-normal in any other way."

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              The majority view fails for the elephant example: "Elephants live in Asia" is false under majority semantics because only 4/10 < 1/2 are Asian.

                              theorem Phenomena.Generics.Studies.Nickel2009.nickel_single_way_is_traditional (entities : List Entity) (normalIn : NormalIn) (w : NormalcyWay) (restrictor scope : Property) :
                              nickelGEN entities normalIn [w] restrictor scope = entities.all fun (e : Entity) => !(restrictor e && normalIn e w) || scope e

                              Nickel's GEN with a single normality way reduces to traditional GEN: if there is only one way of being normal, the existential quantification is trivial and we get back ∀x. normal(x) ∧ restrictor(x) → scope(x).

                              Summary: Three Views of Normality #

                              ViewNormalityGEN formulaHandles elephants?
                              @cite{cohen-1999a}Probability > 0.5P(Q|P) > 0.5No
                              @cite{asher-pelletier-2012}Modal ordering∀w ≤ w₀. P(x,w) → Q(x,w)Partially
                              @cite{nickel-2009}Ways of being normal∃w. ∀x. normal(x,w) → Q(x)Yes

                              The three views are formalized in: