Where the alternatives for just come. Roothian alternatives are the standard focus-semantic alternatives; the other sources are what distinguish just from only.
- roothian : AlternativeSource
- granularity : AlternativeSource
- causal : AlternativeSource
- elaboration : AlternativeSource
- normative : AlternativeSource
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Map each flavor of just to its alternative source.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.associatedSource Phenomena.Focus.Exclusives.JustFlavor.complementExclusion = Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.AlternativeSource.roothian
- Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.associatedSource Phenomena.Focus.Exclusives.JustFlavor.rankOrder = Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.AlternativeSource.roothian
- Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.associatedSource Phenomena.Focus.Exclusives.JustFlavor.emphatic = Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.AlternativeSource.granularity
- Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.associatedSource Phenomena.Focus.Exclusives.JustFlavor.precisifyingEquality = Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.AlternativeSource.granularity
- Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.associatedSource Phenomena.Focus.Exclusives.JustFlavor.minimalSufficiency = Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.AlternativeSource.causal
- Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.associatedSource Phenomena.Focus.Exclusives.JustFlavor.unexplanatory = Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.AlternativeSource.causal
- Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.associatedSource Phenomena.Focus.Exclusives.JustFlavor.unelaboratory = Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.AlternativeSource.elaboration
- Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.associatedSource Phenomena.Focus.Exclusives.JustFlavor.counterexpectational = Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.AlternativeSource.normative
Instances For
A discourse context provides construals of an underspecified question (UQ) together with Quality and Relevance filters.
W is the world/meaning type that questions partition over.
The available construals of UQ_c
Does the speaker have sufficient evidence to answer this QUD?
Is this QUD relevant to the current discourse?
There must be at least one construal
Instances For
A QUD is answerable iff it passes both Quality and Relevance.
Equations
- Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.answerable ctx q = (ctx.quality q && ctx.relevance q)
Instances For
q1 is strictly wider than q2 when q2 refines q1 but not vice versa.
A wider question has a coarser partition — fewer distinctions.
Equations
- Semantics.Montague.Sentence.DomainWidening.strictlyWider q1 q2 = (QUD.refines q2 q1 ∧ ¬QUD.refines q1 q2)
Instances For
q is the widest answerable construal: it is answerable, it is in the
construal set, and no strictly wider answerable construal exists.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Classify a discourse context by WHY the widest answerable construal is optimal.
Connects to Phenomena.Focus.Exclusives.ContextType.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The unified lexical entry for just (@cite{deo-thomas-2025}: §3).
Not-at-issue: The CQ is the widest answerable construal of UQ_c. At-issue: The prejacent, interpreted relative to CQ's granularity.
The 7 flavors are NOT separate entries — they are the same entry interacting with different discourse contexts and alternative sources.
- context : DiscourseContext W
The underspecified question and its construals
- cq : QUD W
The widest answerable construal (= the CQ for just)
- cq_widest : isWidestAnswerable self.context self.cq
The CQ is indeed widest answerable
- prejacent : W → Bool
The prejacent proposition
Instances For
only presupposes the prejacent and asserts no stronger alternative is true.
Equations
Instances For
Only can replace just exactly when the alternatives are Roothian (complement-exclusion and rank-order). Verified against all empirical data.
Quality-failure contexts yield only causal-alternative flavors (unexplanatory, minimal sufficiency).
Relevance-failure contexts yield only elaboration-alternative flavors (unelaboratory).
The 7 flavors are not separate lexical entries. Every flavor in the data is compatible with the unified analysis: the associated source is always well-defined, and context type is always well-defined. No flavor requires a distinct lexical entry.