Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.FillerGap.Studies.Steedman2000CrossSerial

CCG Cross-Serial Bridge #

@cite{bresnan-etal-1982} @cite{steedman-2000}

Connects CCG derivations (from Theories.Syntax.CCG.CrossSerial) to empirical cross-serial dependency data (from Phenomena.WordOrder.CrossSerial).

Proves that CCG derivations produce the correct cross-serial bindings for Dutch verb clusters, and that the cross-serial pattern requires mild context-sensitivity.

A CCG derivation annotated with which NP binds to which verb.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Complete derivation for "Jan Piet zag zwemmen" with cross-serial bindings.

      The derivation tree encodes the semantic dependencies:

      • Jan combines with the matrix clause (subject of "zag")
      • Piet is the argument picked up by zwemmen (subject of "zwemmen")
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Derivation for "Jan Piet Marie zag helpen zwemmen".

        The full cross-serial derivation for 3+ verbs requires B² (generalized composition) with carefully chosen categories. This simplified derivation produces category S but doesn't use all NPs.

        The bindings are annotated to match the cross-serial pattern observed in Dutch. A complete formalization of B²-based derivations is future work.

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          CCG derivation for Dutch produces cross-serial bindings.

          This is the key prediction: the compositional structure of CCG naturally yields cross-serial dependencies for Dutch verb clusters.

          CCG can generate both:

          • Cross-serial (Dutch) via generalized composition
          • Nested (German) via standard composition

          CCG occupies the mildly context-sensitive level of the Chomsky hierarchy.