Bridge: HPSG Relative Clauses to Filler-Gap Phenomena #
@cite{sag-wasow-bender-2003} @cite{pollard-sag-1994}
Connects the HPSG relative clause mechanism (MOD feature + SLASH/GAP
- Head-Modifier Schema) to empirical data in
Phenomena.FillerGap.
Main results #
object_relative_licensed: object relatives derive via complement gap + relativizer + Head-Modifiersubject_relative_licensed: subject relatives derive via subject gap + relativizer + Head-ModifierrelClause_always_modifies: every relative clause derivation produces a modifier (has MOD set)modification_preserves_head_cat: Head-Modifier preserves the head noun's category
Is this relative clause configuration licensed?
A relative clause is licensed when:
- There is a gap in the clause (modeled by gapCat)
- The relativizer produces a modifier for the head noun's category
- The MOD value matches the head noun
Equations
Instances For
Object relative with "that": "the book that John read ___" NP head, NP gap in object position, "that" relativizer.
Equations
- Phenomena.FillerGap.Studies.HPSGRelativeClauses.objectRelThat = { headCat := UD.UPOS.NOUN, gapCat := UD.UPOS.NOUN, rel := HPSG.RelativeClauses.relThat }
Instances For
Object relative with "which": "the book which John read ___"
Equations
- Phenomena.FillerGap.Studies.HPSGRelativeClauses.objectRelWhich = { headCat := UD.UPOS.NOUN, gapCat := UD.UPOS.NOUN, rel := HPSG.RelativeClauses.relWhich }
Instances For
Subject relative with "who": "the boy who saw Mary" NP head, NP gap in subject position, "who" relativizer.
Equations
- Phenomena.FillerGap.Studies.HPSGRelativeClauses.subjectRelWho = { headCat := UD.UPOS.NOUN, gapCat := UD.UPOS.NOUN, rel := HPSG.RelativeClauses.relWho }
Instances For
Subject relative with "that": "the boy that saw Mary"
Equations
- Phenomena.FillerGap.Studies.HPSGRelativeClauses.subjectRelThat = { headCat := UD.UPOS.NOUN, gapCat := UD.UPOS.NOUN, rel := HPSG.RelativeClauses.relThat }
Instances For
PP relative: "the person who(m) John talked to ___" NP head, PP gap (prep stranded), "who" relativizer.
Equations
- Phenomena.FillerGap.Studies.HPSGRelativeClauses.ppRelWho = { headCat := UD.UPOS.NOUN, gapCat := UD.UPOS.ADP, rel := HPSG.RelativeClauses.relWho }
Instances For
Object relative clause data matches HPSG derivation.
The empirical observation (from LongDistance.relativeClauseData):
"the book that John reads" ✓
is licensed by the HPSG derivation:
gap(read, obj) → S[GAP ⟨NP⟩] → that + S[GAP ⟨NP⟩] → [MOD NP]
→ book + [MOD NP] → NP
Subject relative clause data matches HPSG derivation.
The empirical observation: "the boy that sees Mary" ✓ is licensed by the HPSG derivation: gap(see, subj) → S[GAP ⟨NP⟩] → that + S[GAP ⟨NP⟩] → [MOD NP] → boy + [MOD NP] → NP
Every relative clause derivation produces a modifier (has MOD set).
The Head-Modifier Schema preserves the head noun's category.
This is the Head Feature Principle applied to Head-Modifier structures: when a relative clause modifies a noun, the result is still a noun.