Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.FillerGap.Studies.HPSGRelativeClauses

Bridge: HPSG Relative Clauses to Filler-Gap Phenomena #

@cite{sag-wasow-bender-2003} @cite{pollard-sag-1994}

Connects the HPSG relative clause mechanism (MOD feature + SLASH/GAP

Main results #

Configuration for a relative clause dependency.

Instances For

    Is this relative clause configuration licensed?

    A relative clause is licensed when:

    1. There is a gap in the clause (modeled by gapCat)
    2. The relativizer produces a modifier for the head noun's category
    3. The MOD value matches the head noun
    Equations
    Instances For

      Object relative with "that": "the book that John read ___" NP head, NP gap in object position, "that" relativizer.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Subject relative with "who": "the boy who saw Mary" NP head, NP gap in subject position, "who" relativizer.

        Equations
        Instances For

          PP relative: "the person who(m) John talked to ___" NP head, PP gap (prep stranded), "who" relativizer.

          Equations
          Instances For

            Object relative clause data matches HPSG derivation.

            The empirical observation (from LongDistance.relativeClauseData): "the book that John reads" ✓ is licensed by the HPSG derivation: gap(read, obj) → S[GAP ⟨NP⟩] → that + S[GAP ⟨NP⟩] → [MOD NP] → book + [MOD NP] → NP

            Subject relative clause data matches HPSG derivation.

            The empirical observation: "the boy that sees Mary" ✓ is licensed by the HPSG derivation: gap(see, subj) → S[GAP ⟨NP⟩] → that + S[GAP ⟨NP⟩] → [MOD NP] → boy + [MOD NP] → NP

            The Head-Modifier Schema preserves the head noun's category.

            This is the Head Feature Principle applied to Head-Modifier structures: when a relative clause modifies a noun, the result is still a noun.