The Mayan Alignment Puzzle #
@cite{imanishi-2020} @cite{coon-2013a} @cite{dixon-1994}
Theory-neutral observations about the accusative side of Mayan split ergativity. In perfective aspect, Mayan languages uniformly show ergative alignment. In non-perfective aspect, they switch to accusative alignment — but the specific alignment patterns differ across languages.
The Puzzle #
Kaqchikel, Chol, and Q'anjob'al have (nearly) identical biclausal structures for non-perfective clauses, yet display contrastive alignment patterns.
Kaqchikel type (S = ABS, O = ERG/GEN): Both S and A are cross-referenced by absolutive (set B) markers. The transitive object is cross-referenced by ergative/genitive (set A).
Chol/Q'anjob'al type (S = ERG/GEN, O = ABS): Both S and A are cross-referenced by ergative/genitive (set A) markers. The transitive object is cross-referenced by absolutive (set B).
Alignment pattern in the accusative (non-perfective) side of the split. Records which marker set cross-references S (= A on accusative side) and which cross-references O.
- sMarker : MarkerSet
Marker set cross-referencing S (intransitive subject) and A (transitive subject) — these pattern together on the accusative side.
- oMarker : MarkerSet
Marker set cross-referencing O (transitive object).
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Kaqchikel-type accusative alignment: S/A = set B (ABS), O = set A (ERG/GEN).
Equations
- Phenomena.Ergativity.kaqchikelPattern = { sMarker := Fragments.Mayan.MarkerSet.setB, oMarker := Fragments.Mayan.MarkerSet.setA }
Instances For
Chol/Q'anjob'al-type accusative alignment: S/A = set A (ERG/GEN), O = set B (ABS).
Equations
- Phenomena.Ergativity.cholPattern = { sMarker := Fragments.Mayan.MarkerSet.setA, oMarker := Fragments.Mayan.MarkerSet.setB }
Instances For
The two accusative-side patterns are distinct.
The two patterns are mirror images: the marker sets are swapped.
A Mayan language's observable extraction behavior.
- name : String
- absPosition : ABSPosition
- hasExtractionAsymmetry : Bool
Does the language ban A-bar extraction of transitive subjects?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Phenomena.Ergativity.instBEqMayanExtractionDatum.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Tada's Generalization data (table (19) of @cite{coon-mateo-pedro-preminger-2014}, extending @cite{tada-1993}).
The two noted outliers are Yucatec and Ixil (LOW-ABS with extraction asymmetries). Yucatec's AF differs significantly from other Mayan AF; Ixil's absolutive morphemes behave like full pronominal forms.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All HIGH-ABS languages in the sample exhibit extraction asymmetries.
All LOW-ABS languages except the two noted outliers lack extraction asymmetries.
No HIGH-ABS language lacks extraction asymmetries (unattested cell).