Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Comparison.Typology

Comparative Construction Typology (WALS Chapter 121) #

@cite{beck-2009} @cite{haspelmath-2001} @cite{kennedy-2007} @cite{stassen-1985} @cite{stassen-2013}

Cross-linguistic data on how languages express comparison of inequality ("X is taller than Y"), based on @cite{stassen-2013} in WALS Online. Stassen identifies five major construction types attested across a sample of 167 languages, classified by how the standard of comparison (the entity being compared to) is encoded.

The WALS 2013 typology simplifies @cite{stassen-1985}'s original six-type classification. Stassen 1985 (based on 110 languages) distinguishes three subtypes within "locational": separative (standard marked 'from'/ablative), allative (standard marked 'to'/goal), and locative (standard marked 'at'/contact). This finer distinction is crucial to the book's explanatory hypothesis connecting comparative types to temporal chaining constructions (formalized in Studies/Stassen1985.lean). The WALS 2013 typology also adds the "mixed" category not present in the 1985 system.

The typology intersects with two further dimensions:

Key typological generalizations #

  1. Locational comparatives are the most common type worldwide.
  2. Particle comparatives concentrate in Europe (a Standard Average European feature; @cite{haspelmath-2001}).
  3. Exceed comparatives concentrate in West Africa and mainland Southeast Asia.
  4. Conjoined comparatives are the least common type, concentrated in Papuan and Australian languages.
  5. SOV languages strongly favor locational comparatives; SVO languages split between exceed and particle types.

WALS Ch 121: How a language expresses comparison of inequality.

Stassen's classification is based on how the standard of comparison (the Y in "X is more Adj than Y") is encoded. The five types are cross-cutting: a single language may use more than one productively (classified as "mixed").

  • locational : ComparativeType

    Locational: the standard is marked with a locational/ablative case or adposition, as if saying "X is tall from/at Y". Example: Japanese Taroo wa Hanako yori se ga takai 'Taro TOP Hanako than/from tall'. Also Turkish (ablative), Hindi-Urdu (postposition se), Latin (ablative case).

  • exceed : ComparativeType

    Exceed: a verb meaning 'exceed' or 'surpass' is used to encode comparison, as if saying "X exceeds/surpasses Y in tallness". Example: Yoruba Ade ga ju Bola lo 'Ade tall exceed Bola go'. Common in Niger-Congo and mainland Southeast Asian languages.

  • conjoined : ComparativeType

    Conjoined: two juxtaposed or coordinated clauses, one attributing the property to X and the other denying it of Y (or attributing its antonym), as if saying "X is tall, Y is short". Example: Amele (Papuan) uqa busak-i, ija cos-ig-a 'he big-PRED, I small-1SG-PRED'. The rarest type.

  • particle : ComparativeType

    Particle: a dedicated comparative particle or morpheme marks the standard, as in English "X is taller than Y". The particle is not a case marker or adposition with independent spatial meaning. Concentrated in Standard Average European.

  • mixed : ComparativeType

    Mixed: the language uses more than one of the above types productively, without a clear dominant strategy.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      The six comparative construction types of @cite{stassen-1985} Ch 2.

      These are finer than the WALS 2013 types (ComparativeType): the three adverbial subtypes (separative, allative, locative) are collapsed into a single "locational" category in WALS. The six types form a hierarchy based on case assignment and syntactic encoding:

                          Comparative
                         /            \
                  Derived case    Fixed case
                 /        \       /        \
            Conjoined  Particle  Exceed  Adverbial
                                        /    |    \
                                     Sep   All   Loc
      
      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Whether a language has an overt degree word in comparatives.

          @cite{beck-2009} classify languages into three types based on the presence and nature of degree morphology in comparison constructions:

          • Languages with a dedicated degree word (English "more", German "mehr")
          • Languages with comparative morphology but no free degree word (English "-er" suffix, but also Turkish, Japanese)
          • Languages with no degree marking at all (the comparative meaning is derived from context, word order, or the exceed-verb semantics).
          • hasDegreeWord : DegreeWordType

            Has a free degree word (e.g., English "more", French "plus", Mandarin "geng").

          • morphological : DegreeWordType

            Has comparative morphology (affixal) but no free degree word (e.g., English "-er" for short adjectives, Turkish "-rak").

          • noDegreeMarking : DegreeWordType

            No overt degree marking; comparison expressed via exceed verb, juxtaposition, or pragmatic inference.

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              How a language forms superlatives ("X is the tallest").

              Superlative strategies are partially independent of comparative type. Some languages lack a dedicated superlative entirely, using comparatives with a universal standard ("taller than all") or "most" constructions.

              • morphological : SuperlativeStrategy

                Superlative morphology: dedicated affix or stem change (e.g., English "-est", Latin "-issimus").

              • definiteComparative : SuperlativeStrategy

                Definite article + comparative: "the more Adj" = superlative (e.g., Romance languages: French "le plus grand").

              • elative : SuperlativeStrategy

                Elative: special "very/extremely" form without comparison class (e.g., Arabic elative pattern ʔafʕal).

              • exceedAll : SuperlativeStrategy

                Exceed-all: exceed verb + universal quantifier (e.g., "X exceeds all in height").

              • comparativeUniversal : SuperlativeStrategy

                Comparative + universal standard: "X is taller than all" (e.g., Japanese dare yori mo takai 'than anyone tall').

              • none : SuperlativeStrategy

                No dedicated superlative strategy; context or periphrasis used.

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Ch 121 total: 167 languages in the generated WALS dataset.

                  A language's comparative construction profile.

                  • language : String

                    Language name.

                  • iso : String

                    ISO 639-3 code.

                  • comparativeType : ComparativeType

                    WALS Ch 121 comparative type.

                  • degreeWord : DegreeWordType

                    Degree word typology.

                  • superlative : SuperlativeStrategy

                    Primary superlative strategy.

                  • comparativeForm : String

                    Illustrative comparative construction form.

                  • standardMarker : String

                    Standard marker (the "than" equivalent), if applicable.

                  • degreeMarker : String

                    Degree marker ("more" equivalent), if applicable.

                  • basicOrder : String

                    Dominant basic word order (for word-order correlations).

                  • notes : String

                    Notes on the construction.

                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      English: particle comparative with dedicated "than". Dual degree marking: free "more" for polysyllabic adjectives, bound "-er" for short adjectives. Superlative: "-est" or "most". Classic Standard Average European pattern.

                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        German: particle comparative with "als" marking the standard. Comparative formed with suffix "-er" (always synthetic, unlike English). Superlative with "-st" + strong/weak ending. Standard Average European pattern.

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Japanese: locational comparative with postposition "yori" ('from/than') marking the standard. No comparative morphology on the adjective; the bare adjective form is used. SOV order. Superlative via universal standard "dare yori mo" ('than anyone').

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            Mandarin Chinese: exceed comparative using "bi" construction. The verb-like element "bi" introduces the standard, functioning as an exceed-type marker. SVO order. Degree adverb "geng" ('more/even more') is optional.

                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Korean: locational comparative with ablative-like particle "-boda" marking the standard. Some analyses treat "-boda" as a particle (mixed classification). No comparative morphology on the adjective. SOV order.

                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                Turkish: locational comparative with ablative case "-dan"/"-den" marking the standard. Comparative morphology "-rak"/"-rek" exists but is optional. SOV order. Superlative with "en" ('most') + adjective.

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  Yoruba: exceed comparative using verb "ju" ('surpass/exceed'). The parameter (dimension) of comparison is expressed as a separate predicate. Example: "Ade ga ju Bola lo" 'Ade tall exceed Bola go'. SVO order.

                                  Equations
                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                  Instances For

                                    Hindi-Urdu: locational comparative with postposition "se" ('from/than') marking the standard. The comparative adjective is optionally modified by "zyaadaa" ('more'). SOV order.

                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      Russian: particle comparative with "chem" ('than') or genitive case on the standard. Comparative adjective formed with "-ee"/"-ej" suffix or suppletive stem. Relatively free word order (SVO dominant).

                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        Finnish: locational comparative with partitive case marking the standard. Comparative adjective formed with "-mpi" suffix. SOV/SVO flexible order.

                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          Swahili: exceed comparative using verb "-zidi" ('exceed/surpass') or "kuliko" ('than/more than'). SVO order. No comparative morphology on adjectives. Bantu language with agglutinative verb morphology.

                                          Equations
                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                          Instances For

                                            Latin: locational comparative with ablative case marking the standard, or particle "quam" ('than'). Comparative adjective formed with "-ior" suffix. Free word order (SOV tendency). Superlative with "-issimus" suffix.

                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For

                                              Thai: exceed comparative using verb "kwaa" ('exceed/more'). SVO order. The adjective precedes "kwaa", which introduces the standard. No comparative morphology.

                                              Equations
                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                              Instances For

                                                Tagalog: exceed comparative using "mas...kaysa" construction (borrowed from Spanish "mas...que") or native "higit" ('surpass'). Verb-initial (VSO) order.

                                                Equations
                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                Instances For

                                                  Arabic (Modern Standard): elative pattern "ʔafʕal" serves as both comparative and superlative. The standard is marked with "min" ('from'). The elative is a fixed morphological template, not decomposable into degree + adjective.

                                                  Equations
                                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                  Instances For

                                                    Navajo: conjoined comparative. Comparison expressed by juxtaposing two clauses or using the comparative enclitic "-go" with a predicate meaning 'big/much'. Navajo lacks dedicated comparative morphology. SOV order. Athabaskan language.

                                                    Equations
                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                    Instances For

                                                      Martuthunira (Pama-Nyungan, Western Australia): conjoined comparative. Comparison expressed by juxtaposing two clauses, one asserting the property of the comparee and the other denying it (or asserting the antonym) of the standard. Common Australian pattern.

                                                      Equations
                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                      Instances For

                                                        French: particle comparative with "que" ('than') marking the standard. Degree word "plus" ('more') obligatory. Superlative: "le/la plus" + adjective. Standard Average European pattern.

                                                        Equations
                                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                        Instances For

                                                          All language profiles in the sample.

                                                          Equations
                                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                          Instances For

                                                            Does a language have a given comparative type?

                                                            Equations
                                                            Instances For

                                                              Is this an SOV language?

                                                              Equations
                                                              Instances For

                                                                Is this an SVO language?

                                                                Equations
                                                                Instances For

                                                                  Count of languages in the sample with a given comparative type.

                                                                  Equations
                                                                  Instances For

                                                                    In our sample, particle comparative languages are all Indo-European languages of Europe. This reflects @cite{haspelmath-2001}'s identification of the comparative particle as a Standard Average European feature.

                                                                    Equations
                                                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                    Instances For

                                                                      All particle languages in our sample are SVO (or V2).

                                                                      In our sample, exceed comparative languages include Yoruba (W Africa), Mandarin (E Asia), Swahili (E Africa), Thai (SE Asia), and Tagalog (Austronesian). This reflects the areal concentration noted by Stassen.

                                                                      Equations
                                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                      Instances For

                                                                        Conjoined comparatives are the rarest type in our sample (2/18).

                                                                        Equations
                                                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                        Instances For

                                                                          Languages with conjoined comparatives universally lack overt degree marking in our sample: comparison without any morphological apparatus.

                                                                          SOV languages in our sample (Japanese, Korean, Turkish, Hindi-Urdu, Navajo, Latin) tend toward locational comparatives. In our sample, all SOV languages with a single comparative type use locational (the exceptions being Navajo with conjoined, and Latin which is mixed).

                                                                          Equations
                                                                          Instances For

                                                                            Among SOV languages in our sample, locational is the dominant type: more SOV languages use locational than any other single type.

                                                                            SVO languages in our sample are split between exceed (Mandarin, Yoruba, Swahili, Thai) and particle (English, German, Russian, French) types.

                                                                            Equations
                                                                            Instances For

                                                                              Among SVO languages, exceed and particle types are roughly balanced.

                                                                              Exceed-comparative languages in our sample mostly lack bound comparative morphology on adjectives. Comparison is expressed via the verb.

                                                                              Languages with conjoined comparatives also lack dedicated superlative strategies in our sample: if you can't grammaticalize "more than", you typically can't grammaticalize "most" either.

                                                                              Languages with morphological comparative degree marking (suffix "-er"/"-ee" etc.) also tend to have morphological superlatives. In our sample, every language with morphological comparative degree also has a morphological superlative.

                                                                              Every locational comparative in our sample uses a standard marker that also has spatial/ablative meaning ('from', ablative case, partitive case). This is definitional of the locational type but worth verifying: the standard marker is never semantically empty.

                                                                              Equations
                                                                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                              Instances For

                                                                                Particle comparatives in our sample all have overt degree marking (either a free degree word or comparative morphology): the comparative particle co-occurs with explicit degree semantics.

                                                                                Conjoined comparatives in our sample never have degree marking: the absence of a dedicated comparative construction correlates with the absence of dedicated degree morphology.

                                                                                theorem Phenomena.Comparison.Typology.exceed_degree_split :
                                                                                have withDeg := List.filter (fun (x : ComparativeProfile) => x.hasDegWord) exceedLanguages; have withoutDeg := List.filter (fun (x : ComparativeProfile) => x.noDegree) exceedLanguages; withDeg.length > 0 withoutDeg.length > 0

                                                                                Exceed comparatives show a split on degree words: some have overt degree words (Mandarin "geng", Tagalog "mas"), others do not (Yoruba, Swahili, Thai).

                                                                                Sample type distribution: how many languages per comparative type.

                                                                                Number of languages in our sample.

                                                                                theorem Phenomena.Comparison.Typology.word_order_diversity :
                                                                                have sov := (List.filter (fun (x : ComparativeProfile) => x.isSOV) allLanguages).length; have svo := (List.filter (fun (x : ComparativeProfile) => x.isSVO) allLanguages).length; have vso := (List.filter (fun (p : ComparativeProfile) => p.basicOrder == "VSO" || p.basicOrder == "VSO/SVO") allLanguages).length; sov > 0 svo > 0 vso > 0

                                                                                The sample covers at least 3 word-order types: SOV, SVO, and VSO.

                                                                                Languages that lack a dedicated comparative construction (conjoined type, which is "comparison without comparison" in Stassen's terms) also lack dedicated superlative strategies. This is an implicational universal: SUPERLATIVE → COMPARATIVE (contrapositive: no comparative → no superlative). Our sample data is consistent with this universal.

                                                                                The major comparison construction types found cross-linguistically.

                                                                                Instances For
                                                                                  Equations
                                                                                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                  Instances For

                                                                                    What is being compared — the syntactic category of the gradable expression, following @cite{wellwood-2015}.

                                                                                    The key insight: comparison constructions apply uniformly across categories; what varies is the measured domain (entity, event, state).

                                                                                    Instances For
                                                                                      Equations
                                                                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                      Instances For

                                                                                        How degree comparison is morphologically realized in a given form.

                                                                                        This is orthogonal to DegreeWordType (above), which classifies whether a language has degree marking at all. DegreeMorphology classifies a specific form: English "taller" is synthetic, "more tall" is analytic, "better" is suppletive — all in a language that DegreeWordType classifies as .hasDegreeWord.

                                                                                        Instances For
                                                                                          Equations
                                                                                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                                                          Instances For