Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Assertion.Basic

Assertion Phenomena: Theory-Neutral Data #

@cite{gunlogson-2001} @cite{lauer-2013} @cite{searle-1969}

Empirical observations about assertion that any theory should account for. These data points are theory-neutral: they describe observable patterns without importing from Theories/.

Data Points #

  1. Hedged assertions reduce commitment strength
  2. Oath formulae increase commitment strength
  3. Rising declaratives shift commitment source
  4. Retraction withdraws a prior commitment
  5. Lying involves commitment without belief

Hedged assertion datum: hedging expressions reduce commitment.

"I think it's raining" commits the speaker less strongly than "It's raining." The propositional content is the same; the commitment profile differs.

  • hedge : String

    The hedge expression ("I think", "maybe", "probably")

  • content : String

    The propositional content

  • reducesCommitment : Bool

    Does the hedge reduce commitment? (always true empirically)

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Canonical hedging examples.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        All canonical hedges reduce commitment.

        Oath formula datum: oath expressions increase commitment.

        "I swear it's raining" commits the speaker more strongly than "It's raining." The speaker stakes their credibility on the content.

        • oath : String

          The oath expression ("I swear", "I promise", "I guarantee")

        • content : String

          The propositional content

        • increasesCommitment : Bool

          Does the oath increase commitment? (always true empirically)

        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Canonical oath examples.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              All canonical oaths increase commitment.

              Rising declarative datum: intonation shifts commitment source.

              "It's raining?" (rising) attributes the content to the addressee, while "It's raining." (falling) commits the speaker. Same words, different intonation, different commitment profile.

              • content : String

                The content

              • isRising : Bool

                Is the intonation rising?

              • speakerCommits : Bool

                Does the speaker commit?

              • attributedToAddressee : Bool

                Is the content attributed to the addressee?

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Falling vs rising contrast.

                  Equations
                  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                  Instances For

                    Retraction datum: withdrawing a prior commitment.

                    "I take that back" / "Actually, never mind" removes a previously asserted proposition from the speaker's commitments. Not all theories support this operation.

                    • content : String

                      The retracted content

                    • retraction : String

                      The retraction expression

                    • isFelicitous : Bool

                      Is the retraction felicitous?

                    Instances For
                      Equations
                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                      Instances For

                        Retraction examples.

                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Lying datum: commitment without belief.

                          A liar publicly commits to p while privately believing ¬p. The assertion has the same surface form as a sincere assertion, but the speaker's internal state diverges from their public commitment.

                          • asserted : String

                            What the speaker asserts (public commitment)

                          • believed : String

                            What the speaker believes (private state)

                          • commitmentBeliefDiverge : Bool

                            Do commitment and belief diverge?

                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Lying involves commitment-belief divergence.

                              Equations
                              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                              Instances For

                                All lying examples show commitment-belief divergence.