Assertion Phenomena: Theory-Neutral Data #
@cite{gunlogson-2001} @cite{lauer-2013} @cite{searle-1969}
Empirical observations about assertion that any theory should account for.
These data points are theory-neutral: they describe observable patterns
without importing from Theories/.
Data Points #
- Hedged assertions reduce commitment strength
- Oath formulae increase commitment strength
- Rising declaratives shift commitment source
- Retraction withdraws a prior commitment
- Lying involves commitment without belief
Hedged assertion datum: hedging expressions reduce commitment.
"I think it's raining" commits the speaker less strongly than "It's raining." The propositional content is the same; the commitment profile differs.
- hedge : String
The hedge expression ("I think", "maybe", "probably")
- content : String
The propositional content
- reducesCommitment : Bool
Does the hedge reduce commitment? (always true empirically)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Canonical hedging examples.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All canonical hedges reduce commitment.
Oath formula datum: oath expressions increase commitment.
"I swear it's raining" commits the speaker more strongly than "It's raining." The speaker stakes their credibility on the content.
- oath : String
The oath expression ("I swear", "I promise", "I guarantee")
- content : String
The propositional content
- increasesCommitment : Bool
Does the oath increase commitment? (always true empirically)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Canonical oath examples.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All canonical oaths increase commitment.
Rising declarative datum: intonation shifts commitment source.
"It's raining?" (rising) attributes the content to the addressee, while "It's raining." (falling) commits the speaker. Same words, different intonation, different commitment profile.
- content : String
The content
- isRising : Bool
Is the intonation rising?
- speakerCommits : Bool
Does the speaker commit?
- attributedToAddressee : Bool
Is the content attributed to the addressee?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Falling vs rising contrast.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Rising declaratives do not commit the speaker.
Falling declaratives commit the speaker.
Retraction datum: withdrawing a prior commitment.
"I take that back" / "Actually, never mind" removes a previously asserted proposition from the speaker's commitments. Not all theories support this operation.
- content : String
The retracted content
- retraction : String
The retraction expression
- isFelicitous : Bool
Is the retraction felicitous?
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Retraction examples.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Lying datum: commitment without belief.
A liar publicly commits to p while privately believing ¬p. The assertion has the same surface form as a sincere assertion, but the speaker's internal state diverges from their public commitment.
- asserted : String
What the speaker asserts (public commitment)
- believed : String
What the speaker believes (private state)
- commitmentBeliefDiverge : Bool
Do commitment and belief diverge?
Instances For
Equations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Lying involves commitment-belief divergence.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
All lying examples show commitment-belief divergence.