Documentation

Linglib.Phenomena.Agreement.NounCategorization

Noun Categorization and Agreement Typology #

@cite{aikhenvald-2000} @cite{chierchia-1998} @cite{dixon-1982} @cite{greenberg-1972}

Cross-linguistic typology of noun categorization systems, following @cite{aikhenvald-2000}. The central diagnostic is agreement: noun class/gender systems (French) require it; classifier systems (Mandarin, Japanese) lack it. This is @cite{dixon-1982}'s definitional divide.

This file provides the cross-linguistic context for the English-specific agreement data in Agreement.Basic, Agreement.DetNoun, and Agreement.Case: why do some languages use agreement-based noun categorization while others use classifiers?

Part I — Typology #

Three languages from three families mapped to NounCategorizationSystem:

System descriptions are derived from Fragment data (single source of truth).

Part II — Universals #

Aikhenvald's empirical generalizations (Chapters 11, 15): agreement diagnostics, semantic parameter universals, inventory size constraints, @cite{greenberg-1972} classifier–number complementarity.

Thread map #

French noun categorization: 2-class gender system (masc/fem). Agreement on determiners, adjectives, and past participles. Aikhenvald type: noun class.

Equations
  • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For

    Italian noun categorization: 2-class gender system (masc/fem). Like French, [-arg, +pred]. Agreement on determiners (il/la, un/una), adjectives (‑o/‑a), and past participles (‑o/‑a). Richer article allomorphy than French (il/lo/la, i/gli/le).

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Mandarin noun categorization: numeral classifier system. Large inventory, semantically motivated, no agreement. Aikhenvald type: numeral classifier.

      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For

        Japanese noun categorization: numeral classifier system (josūshi). Similar to Mandarin but with native Japanese default counter (つ). Aikhenvald type: numeral classifier.

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Mandarin inventory is derived from the classifier lexicon.

          Japanese inventory is derived from the classifier lexicon.

          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            Bare NPs are licensed in [+arg] languages, not in [-arg] languages. This connects Fragment-level bare NP facts to the typological parameter.

            U1 (Aikhenvald Table 15.1): Noun class / gender systems require agreement. This is definitional — agreement is what makes a noun class system a "class" rather than a "classifier" (@cite{dixon-1982}, Table 1.2).

            U2 (Aikhenvald Table 15.1): Numeral classifier systems lack agreement. Classifiers are independent morphemes, not agreement markers. Witnessed by Mandarin and Japanese in our typology.

            U3 (Aikhenvald §11.1.1): Classifier selection is always at least partly semantic. There are no purely phonological or purely morphological classifier systems (unlike noun class, which can be morphological).

            U4 (Aikhenvald Table 15.2): Noun class assignment may be mixed (semantic core + morphological overlay), while classifier systems are purely semantic. Witnessed by French (mixed) vs Mandarin (semantic).

            U5 (Aikhenvald §11.1.1): Animacy (animate vs. inanimate or human vs. non-human) is a semantic parameter found in EVERY type of noun categorization device. This is the universal semantic "core."

            U6 (Aikhenvald §11.1.1): Physical properties (shape, size) are the preferred semantic parameters for numeral classifiers, while animacy is the core for noun classes.

            U8 (Aikhenvald Table 15.1): Noun class systems have small inventories (2–20 classes), while classifier systems have large inventories (typically 20–200+).

            U9 (Aikhenvald §1.5): Classifier systems have larger inventories than noun class systems. Open (extendable) vs. closed.

            Table 10.17 interaction matrix (simplified): Which grammatical categories interact with which classifier types.

            Key patterns:

            • Noun classes interact with definiteness, number, case, tense/aspect
            • Numeral classifiers interact with number, definiteness
            • Verbal classifiers interact with tense/aspect
            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Whether a classifier type typically interacts with a grammatical category (Aikhenvald Table 10.17).

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Noun classes interact with more grammatical categories than numeral classifiers (Table 10.17). This reflects their deeper grammaticalization.

                  U12: Every numeral classifier system has a semantically bleached default classifier that can substitute for any specific classifier (Aikhenvald §4.2). The default is the "elsewhere" case.

                  Witnessed by: Mandarin 个 gè, Japanese つ tsu.