Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Spanish.Clitics

Spanish Clitic Paradigm #

@cite{munoz-perez-2026}

The full Spanish clitic paradigm, with syncretism data critical for Muñoz @cite{munoz-perez-2026}. The key observation: 1SG and 2SG are syncretic across accusative, dative, and reflexive, while 3SG/PL are not. This syncretism drives the availability of stylistic applicatives.

Paradigm (Muñoz @cite{munoz-perez-2026}, ex. 59) #

ACCDATREFL
1SGmememe
2SGtetete
3SGlo/lale/sese
1PLnosnosnos
2/3PLlos/lasles/sese

The three-way case distinction for Spanish clitics.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      A single clitic form in the paradigm.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For
          Equations
          Instances For

            The full clitic paradigm as a flat list.

            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Look up the form for a given person, number, and case in the paradigm.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Are two clitic cases syncretic for a given person/number combination? DERIVED from the paradigm data: syncretism holds iff the looked-up forms are identical (and both exist).

                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  The set of person/number combinations where DAT and REFL are syncretic. This is the key condition for SE-optionality.

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    1SG: dative and reflexive are syncretic (both "me").

                    2SG: dative and reflexive are syncretic (both "te").

                    3SG: dative and reflexive are NOT syncretic ("le" ≠ "se").

                    1PL: dative and reflexive are syncretic (both "nos").

                    3PL: dative and reflexive are NOT syncretic ("les" ≠ "se").

                    1SG forms are identical across all three cases.

                    2SG forms are identical across all three cases.

                    3SG dative ≠ 3SG reflexive (le ≠ se).