Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Mayan.Chol.Agreement

Chol Agreement and Case Fragment @cite{coon-2013a} #

@cite{imanishi-2020}

Agreement morphology and case assignment for Chol (Cholan, Mayan), a low absolutive language with aspect-based split ergativity.

The System #

Chol has two agreement paradigms:

Morpheme order: Asp-SET_A-V-SET_B (low absolutive order, contrasting with Kaqchikel's Asp-SET_B-SET_A-V).

Case Licensing (@cite{coon-2013a}; @cite{imanishi-2020}, §2.4.3) #

Accusative Side (Non-Perfective) #

In non-perfective aspect, the aspectual predicate choñkol embeds a nominalized clause. The RON does NOT hold: the external argument may be generated inside the nominalized clause. Result: S/A = GEN (from D), O = ABS (from Voice).

Argument positions in a Chol clause.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Case assignment in non-perfective (accusative) clauses. Since the RON does not hold, the subject appears inside the nominalized clause as the highest DP and receives GEN from D. The object receives ABS from Voice (low absolutive).

      Equations
      Instances For

        Chol's absolutive morphemes appear in low position (at the end of the verb stem, post-stem). Observable from morpheme order: ASP-ERG-ROOT-(DERIV)-SUFFIX-ABS.

        Equations
        Instances For

          Extraction possibilities in Chol transitive clauses. Unlike Q'anjob'al, Chol allows both A and P arguments to extract freely. There are no extraction asymmetries — Chol lacks syntactic ergativity.

          The resulting ambiguity (when both arguments are 3rd person) is a natural consequence of the absence of extraction restrictions: Maxki₁ tyi y-il-ä (___₁) jiñi wiñik (___₁)? 'Who saw the man?' / 'Who did the man see?'

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Chol's extraction profile: no special morphology for any extraction.

              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                In Chol non-finite embedded clauses (aspectless), absolutive objects ARE available. This follows from Chol being LOW-ABS: v⁰ assigns case to the object without needing Infl⁰.

                Mejl [i-k'el-oñ] 'She can see me.' (ABS object ✓) Choñkol [k-mek'-ety] 'I am hugging you.' (ABS object ✓)

                Equations
                Instances For

                  Absolutive intransitive subjects are NOT available in Chol non-finite clauses: they must be marked with the ergative/possessive prefix instead.

                  Choñkol [k-ts'äm-el] 'I am bathing.' (ERG prefix, not ABS) *Choñkol [ts'äm-i-yoñ] intended: 'I am bathing.' (ABS ✗)

                  Equations
                  Instances For