Latin Case Inventory @cite{blake-1994} #
Latin has 6 cases in the standard description (@cite{blake-1994}, passim): NOM, ACC, GEN, DAT, ABL, VOC. Latin is Blake's primary example language throughout Case — its paradigms illustrate syncretism patterns (Ch. 2, pp. 19–24), the core/peripheral distinction, and the ABL's wide functional range (source, instrument, cause, comparison).
A vestigial locative survives for a few nouns (place names, domī 'at home', humī 'on the ground'). Including it gives a 7-case inventory that satisfies Blake's contiguity; the standard 6-case inventory has a gap at rank 3 (LOC) between DAT and ABL.
Syncretism #
Latin syncretism patterns divide into two groups:
- NOM + ACC: neuter nouns (2nd, 3rd, 4th declension)
- DAT + ABL: plural across all declensions
Standard Latin 6-case inventory (NOM ACC GEN DAT ABL VOC).
Equations
Instances For
The hierarchy-relevant subset (excluding VOC at rank 0).
Equations
Instances For
Latin's 5-case core inventory fails strict contiguity: DAT (rank 4) and ABL (rank 2) have no LOC (rank 3) between them.
With the vestigial locative, contiguous on ranks 6–2. VOC (rank 0) creates a gap at rank 1 under strict checking, so we validate the hierarchy-relevant subset without it.
Equations
Instances For
NOM/ACC syncretism in neuter nouns (2nd, 3rd, 4th declension).
Instantiates the cross-linguistic NOM/ACC pattern from Core.Case.Syncretism.
Equations
Instances For
NOM/ACC is same-tier (both rank 6) — trivially adjacent.
DAT/ABL syncretism in the plural.
Equations
- Fragments.Latin.Case.pluralDatAblSyncretism = { case1 := Core.Case.dat, case2 := Core.Case.abl, neq := Fragments.Latin.Case.pluralDatAblSyncretism._proof_1 }
Instances For
DAT/ABL are NOT strictly adjacent on the hierarchy (ranks 4, 2) — LOC (rank 3) intervenes. But they ARE inventory-adjacent in the standard 6-case system that lacks LOC.
Latin ABL is the textbook case of case extension: a single
morphological form covers source (ablativus separativus), instrumental
(ablativus instrumenti), and causal (ablativus causae) functions.
These are exactly the ablative extension targets in @cite{heine-2009}
Table 29.6, formalized in Core.caseExtension.