Documentation

Linglib.Fragments.Dargwa.Case

Dargwa (Tanti) Case Inventory @cite{sumbatova-2021} #

Dargwa (Tanti dialect; Nakh-Dagestanian) has a consistently ergative alignment system — unlike Georgian's tense-conditioned split. All transitive verbs mark the A-argument with ergative -li and leave the P-argument unmarked (absolutive). There is no split conditioning.

Grammatical Cases (Table 4.3 of @cite{sumbatova-2021}) #

CaseMorphemeFunction
absolutiveS-argument, P-argument, nominal pred.
ergative-liA-argument, instrument
genitive-la, -llanominal modifier, possessor
dativeexperiencer, recipient, benefactive
comitative-c:elecomitative, instrument
adverbial-lenominal predicate, secondary predicate

Locative System #

In addition to the 6 grammatical cases above, Dargwa has a rich spatial case system. Locative forms decompose into three morphological layers:

STEM — LOCALIZATION — ORIENTATION — DIRECTION

Eight localizations (SUPER, SUB, ANTE, IN, INTER, AD, APUD, POST) × four orientations (LATIVE, ELATIVE, ESSIVE, TRANSLATIVE) × four directions (UP, DOWN, HITHER, THITHER).

This yields a large paradigm, though not all cells are filled.

Dargwa grammatical case inventory: ABS(∅), ERG(-li), GEN(-la, -lla), DAT(-ž), COM(-c:ele), ADV(-le).

We use Core.Case values. The adverbial case is mapped to ess (essive) as the closest typological equivalent — it marks "being-in-a-state" predicates, analogous to the Finnish essive.

Genitive has two allomorphs: -la and -lla.

Equations
Instances For

    Dargwa's grammatical case inventory violates strict contiguity on Blake's hierarchy: COM (rank 1) and ESS (rank 0) are present without LOC (rank 3) or ABL/INST (rank 2). This is expected: Dargwa's rich locative system (8 localizations × 4 orientations) functionally covers spatial and source meanings that LOC and ABL encode in other languages. The grammatical vs. locative split is a structural feature of Nakh-Dagestanian languages.

    Dargwa alignment: consistently ergative — no tense/aspect split. Transitive A-arguments always take ergative -li; S and P arguments take unmarked absolutive.

    Equations
    Instances For

      Case of the transitive agent (A-argument): always ergative.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Case of the S-argument and P-argument: always absolutive.

        Equations
        Instances For

          Localization values: spatial domain w.r.t. the reference point. Tanti has 8 localizations (@cite{sumbatova-2021} §4.4.3.3).

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Orientation values: motion w.r.t. the reference point. Tanti has 4 orientations (@cite{sumbatova-2021} §4.4.3.3).

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  Direction values: motion w.r.t. the speaker. Tanti has 4 directions (@cite{sumbatova-2021} §4.4.3.3).

                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      A full locative form combines all three layers.

                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Well-formedness of a locative form, encoding all combinatorial constraints from @cite{sumbatova-2021} §4.4.3.3:

                          Direction: absent in essive and translative, obligatory in elative, optional in lative.

                          Localization × Orientation: translative combines only with SUB, ANTE, POST. POST combines only with translative.

                          Equations
                          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                          Instances For

                            The inventory contains both core ergative cases.

                            Translative combines only with SUB, ANTE, and POST (@cite{sumbatova-2021} ex. 13).

                            POST + LATIVE is ill-formed (POST only combines with translative).

                            POST + TRANSLATIVE is the only well-formed POST combination.

                            Elative requires a direction marker.

                            Essive rejects direction markers.

                            SUPER-ELATIVE-HITHER (ex. 16: 'from the bridge hither') is well-formed.

                            theorem Fragments.Dargwa.Case.super_essive :
                            { localization := Localization.super, orientation := Orientation.essive, direction := none }.wellFormed = true

                            SUPER-ESSIVE (ex. 12: 'on the bridge, position') is well-formed.

                            SUB-TRANSLATIVE (ex. 13: 'under the bridge, motion') is well-formed.

                            Translative + SUPER is ill-formed.