Subjectivity Cline #
@cite{traugott-dasher-2002} @cite{traugott-2010}
Traugott & Dasher's synchronic cline of (inter)subjectivity, formalized as an ordered type. Expressions range from nonsubjective (ideational, propositional) through subjective (speaker attitude/belief) to intersubjective (addressee face/self-image). The diachronic hypothesis is that coded (inter)subjective meanings arise later than non-subjective ones; subjectification precedes intersubjectification.
Bridges #
EpistemicAuthoritytoSubjectivityLevel: ego = subjective, allocutive = intersubjective, nonparticipant = nonSubjective.- The cline connects modal semantics (speaker assessment = subjective), politeness (addressee face = intersubjective), and RSA (speaker model = subjectified speaker).
Synchronic subjectivity scale (@cite{traugott-dasher-2002} Table 1, @cite{traugott-2010} cline 2). Diachronic work shows that subjective polysemies arise later than ideational ones, and intersubjective polysemies arise later than subjective ones.
- nonSubjective : SubjectivityLevel
- subjective : SubjectivityLevel
- intersubjective : SubjectivityLevel
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Core.Subjectivity.instBEqSubjectivityLevel.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Numeric encoding for ordering.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- Core.Subjectivity.instLESubjectivityLevel = { le := fun (a b : Core.Subjectivity.SubjectivityLevel) => a.toNat ≤ b.toNat }
Equations
- Core.Subjectivity.instLTSubjectivityLevel = { lt := fun (a b : Core.Subjectivity.SubjectivityLevel) => a.toNat < b.toNat }
Equations
Equations
The cline is totally ordered.
Bridge: epistemic authority to subjectivity level.
- ego (speaker has privileged access) maps to subjective
- allocutive (addressee has privileged access) maps to intersubjective
- nonparticipant maps to nonSubjective
Equations
- Core.Subjectivity.SubjectivityLevel.ofEpistemicAuthority Core.Epistemicity.EpistemicAuthority.ego = Core.Subjectivity.SubjectivityLevel.subjective
- Core.Subjectivity.SubjectivityLevel.ofEpistemicAuthority Core.Epistemicity.EpistemicAuthority.allocutive = Core.Subjectivity.SubjectivityLevel.intersubjective
- Core.Subjectivity.SubjectivityLevel.ofEpistemicAuthority Core.Epistemicity.EpistemicAuthority.nonparticipant = Core.Subjectivity.SubjectivityLevel.nonSubjective
Instances For
Intersubjectivity presupposes subjectivity (@cite{traugott-2010} section 2).
Non-subjective is the minimum.
Whether the utterance constitutes the act it describes or merely reports it.
The performative/descriptive distinction originates with Austin (1962) and cross-cuts subjectivity: a speaker-oriented utterance can be performative ("You must go" — creates the obligation) or descriptive ("He must be home" — assesses without creating). @cite{narrog-2012} §2.4 argues that Traugott's subjectivity cline conflates speaker-orientation with performativity, collapsing distinctions that matter for face-threat, person restrictions, and diachronic change paths.
This dimension connects to:
- Modal semantics: deontic = performative; epistemic = descriptive
- Politeness: performative + volitive = face-threatening (Brown & Levinson)
- Speech acts: performatives (Austin) vs constatives
- performative : Performativity
- descriptive : Performativity
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Core.Subjectivity.instBEqPerformativity.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)