Documentation

Linglib.Core.Scales.EpistemicScale

Epistemic Comparative Likelihood — Main Theorems #

@cite{holliday-icard-2013} @cite{halpern-2003} @cite{kraft-pratt-seidenberg-1959} @cite{van-der-hoek-1996}

Re-exports EpistemicScale.Defs (axioms, structures, semantics), EpistemicScale.Representability (KPS counterexample, Fin 0–3 proofs), and EpistemicScale.Cancellation88 (Fin 4 via Scott cancellation), then states the top-level KPS theorems (8a, 8b) and completeness results.

theorem Core.Scale.theorem8a {W : Type u_1} [Fintype W] (sys : EpistemicSystemFA W) (hcard : Fintype.card W < 5) :
∃ (m : FinAddMeasure W), ∀ (A B : Set W), sys.ge A B m.inducedGe A B

Theorem 8a: for |W| < 5, every FA model is representable by a finitely additive probability measure. Below 5 worlds, the logics FA and FP∞ coincide.

The proof transfers an arbitrary Fintype W to Fin n via Fintype.equivFin, applies the per-cardinality proof for n ∈ {0,1,2,3,4}, and transports the resulting measure back.

theorem Core.Scale.theorem8b :
∃ (W : Type) (x : Fintype W) (sys : EpistemicSystemFA W), Fintype.card W = 5 ¬∃ (m : FinAddMeasure W), ∀ (A B : Set W), sys.ge A B m.inducedGe A B

Theorem 8b: for |W| ≥ 5, FA is strictly weaker than FP∞ — there exists a 5-element type with an FA ordering admitting no finitely additive measure representation.

theorem Core.Scale.theorem6_completeness {W : Type u_1} [Fintype W] (sys : EpistemicSystemFA W) :
∃ (m : QualAddMeasure W), ∀ (A B : Set W), sys.ge A B m.inducedGe A B

Theorem 6 completeness (@cite{holliday-icard-2013}, Theorem 6; @cite{van-der-hoek-1996}): every EpistemicSystemFA is representable by a qualitatively additive measure.

Construction: define μ(A) = |{S : Finset W | ge A S}| / 2^|W|. Totality + transitivity of ge ensure μ A ≥ μ B ↔ ge A B; qualitative additivity then follows from Axiom A.

theorem Core.Scale.theorem2_completeness {W : Type u_1} [Fintype W] (sys : EpistemicSystemW W) (hTran : ∀ (A B C : Set W), sys.ge A Bsys.ge B Csys.ge A C) (hJ : EpistemicAxiom.J sys.ge) (hDS : EpistemicAxiom.DS sys.ge) :
∃ (ge_w : WWProp) (_ : ∀ (w : W), ge_w w w), ∀ (A B : Set W), sys.ge A B halpernLift ge_w A B

Theorem 2 (@cite{halpern-2003}, Thm. 7.5.1a; @cite{holliday-icard-2013}): an epistemic system satisfying R, T, Tran, J (right-union), and DS (determination by singletons) is representable by Lewis's l-lifting from a reflexive preorder on worlds.

The paper states this as a logic completeness theorem for WJR (K + BT + Tran + J + Mon + R). We prove the underlying per-model representation result, which is the model-theoretic core: the semantic hypotheses (R, T, Tran, J, DS) correspond to WJR's axioms evaluated on a single model, without formalizing the syntax or proof system.

Construction: ge_w u v := sys.ge {u} {v}.

theorem Core.Scale.axiomA_iff_fa {W : Type u_1} (ge : Set WSet WProp) :
EpistemicAxiom.A ge ∀ (A B C : Set W), (∀ xA, xC)(∀ xB, xC) → (ge A B ge (A C) (B C))

Algebraic bridge: Axiom A and the finite additivity property of AdditiveScale are equivalent for any comparison on sets.

Binary epistemic classification, parallel to MereoTag.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.