Documentation

Linglib.Core.Relativization.Hierarchy

Accessibility Hierarchy: Ordering and Contiguity #

@cite{keenan-comrie-1977}

Defines the rank function and contiguity predicate for the Accessibility Hierarchy. Mirrors Core.Case.Hierarchy for Blake's case hierarchy.

Numeric rank of a position on the Accessibility Hierarchy. Higher rank = more accessible = more languages can relativize it.

Equations
Instances For

    Position p1 is at least as accessible as p2 on the hierarchy.

    Equations
    Instances For

      Position p1 is strictly more accessible than p2.

      Equations
      Instances For

        A set of AH positions forms a contiguous segment on the hierarchy: for every pair of positions in the set, all intermediate ranks are also represented.

        Mirrors Core.validInventory for the case hierarchy (@cite{blake-1994}).

        This formalizes HC₂ of @cite{keenan-comrie-1977}: "Any RC-forming strategy must apply to a continuous segment of the AH."

        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          A marker's positions form a contiguous segment of the AH.

          Equations
          Instances For

            Subject is the most accessible position (rank 6).

            Object of comparison is the least accessible position (rank 1).

            Accessibility is reflexive.

            The full hierarchy [SU, DO, IO, OBL, GEN, OCOMP] is contiguous.

            A single position is trivially contiguous.

            theorem Core.prc_from_hc2 (positions : List AHPosition) (h_contig : contiguousOnAH positions = true) (h_su : (positions.any fun (x : AHPosition) => x == AHPosition.subject) = true) (p above : AHPosition) (hp : (positions.any fun (x : AHPosition) => x == p) = true) (habove : above.rank > p.rank) :
            (positions.any fun (x : AHPosition) => x == above) = true

            Primary Relativization Constraint (general proof).

            If a list of AH positions is contiguous (HC₂) and contains .subject (i.e., the strategy is primary), then the list is upward-closed: for any covered position p, all positions above p on the AH are also covered.

            This proves that the PRC is a logical consequence of HC₂ + being primary, not an independent constraint — the paper's core derivation.