Narrog (2010, 2012) Deontic Necessity Typology #
@cite{narrog-2012} @cite{narrog-2010}
Cross-linguistic survey data on deontic necessity from a genealogically diverse sample of 200 languages (@cite{narrog-2010} appendix; @cite{narrog-2012} Table 6.6).
Data sources #
Table 3 / Table 6.5: Area-level counts of whether each language has grammaticalized obligation (NEC) and/or ability/situational possibility (POT) markers, split by 6 geographic areas.
Table 4 / Table 6.6: Aggregate counts of deontic necessity type (strong, weak, neutral, indeterminate). These are the finest-grained published data — per-language type assignments are not available.
Appendix: The 200 languages in the sample, listed by phylum.
Notes #
- The total of Table 4 (60 + 62 + 22 + 32 = 176) exceeds 131 (languages with any NEC marker) because 44 languages had markers of multiple types (@cite{narrog-2010} fn. 17).
- Per-language deontic necessity type assignments are not published; only aggregate counts are available.
How a language grammaticalizes deontic necessity. From @cite{narrog-2010} Table 4 / @cite{narrog-2012} Table 6.6.
- strong : DeonticNecessityType
- weak : DeonticNecessityType
- neutral : DeonticNecessityType
- indeterminate : DeonticNecessityType
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Language counts by deontic necessity type. Source: @cite{narrog-2010} Table 4, reproduced in @cite{narrog-2012} Table 6.6 (p. 251).
Total exceeds 200 because 44 languages have markers of multiple types (@cite{narrog-2010} fn. 17).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The sample size: 200 genealogically diverse languages.
Equations
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- Core.Modality.DeonticNecessity.instBEqArea.beq x✝ y✝ = (x✝.ctorIdx == y✝.ctorIdx)
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Core.Modality.DeonticNecessity.instBEqAreaModalPresence.beq x✝¹ x✝ = false
Instances For
Instances For
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Count of a specific deontic necessity type.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Total languages across all areas.
Equations
Instances For
Total languages with any NEC marker (both + onlyNec).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Total languages with any POT marker (both + onlyPot).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Area totals sum to the sample size.
Languages with any NEC marker: 121 + 10 = 131.
Languages with any POT marker: 121 + 35 = 156. (Paper says 157 = 121 + 35 + 1; the discrepancy is in the original.)
Strong deontic necessity: 60 languages.
Weak deontic necessity: 62 languages.
Neutral: 22 languages.
Indeterminate: 32 languages.
POT markers are more common than NEC markers cross-linguistically. @cite{narrog-2010} p. 406: 156 vs 131.