Three-Valued Logics: LP and K3 #
@cite{kleene-1952}
LP (Logic of Paradox) and K3 (Strong Kleene logic) are dual three-valued logics built on the same truth tables but with different designated values:
- K3 (Strong Kleene): designated value = {1}. Preserves truth.
- LP (Logic of Paradox): designated values = {1, ½}. Preserves non-falsity.
Both use Strong Kleene connectives (already in Core/Logic/Truth3.lean).
The only difference is what counts as "satisfied": K3 requires value 1
(like classical truth), while LP accepts value ½ as well (overlap of
truth and falsity, as in paraconsistent logic).
Key Results #
- LP/K3 duality via negation: LP-sat(¬φ) ↔ ¬K3-sat(φ)
- LP preserves excluded middle: P ∨ ¬P is always LP-designated
- K3 has no tautologies: every formula gets value ½ in the all-indeterminate model
- Explosion fails in LP: P ∧ ¬P ⊭^LP Q
- Conjunction respects designation: LP/K3 designation distributes over Strong Kleene conjunction
Connection to TCS #
@cite{cobreros-etal-2012} Theorem 3: in the restricted vocabulary,
t-consequence = LP-consequence and s-consequence = K3-consequence.
The correspondence is proved in Theories/Semantics/Supervaluation/TCS.lean.
LP-designated: value is non-false (true or indeterminate). In LP, ½ is in the overlap of truth and falsity — both P and ¬P can hold. This makes LP paraconsistent: contradictions don't entail everything.
Equations
Instances For
K3-designated: value is true (= 1). The only designated value. This makes K3 paracomplete: some formulas (borderline cases) are neither true nor false.
Equations
Instances For
LP/K3 duality via negation. LP-designation of the negation is equivalent to K3-non-designation of the original. This is the semantic core of duality between LP and K3.
K3-designation of the negation ↔ LP-non-designation.
LP-designation distributes over Strong Kleene conjunction.
K3-designation distributes over Strong Kleene conjunction.
K3-designation implies LP-designation.
Both designations agree on classical (bivalent) values.
Propositional formulas over an atom type. Structurally identical
to TCSFormula but parameterized by a single type.
- atom {Atom : Type u_1} : Atom → PropFormula Atom
- neg {Atom : Type u_1} : PropFormula Atom → PropFormula Atom
- conj {Atom : Type u_1} : PropFormula Atom → PropFormula Atom → PropFormula Atom
Instances For
A many-valued model: assigns a three-valued truth value to each atom.
Equations
- Core.Logic.ThreeValuedLogic.MVModel Atom = (Atom → Core.Duality.Truth3)
Instances For
Three-valued formula evaluation using Strong Kleene connectives. This is the semantic core shared by LP and K3 — the only difference is which values count as designated.
Equations
- Core.Logic.ThreeValuedLogic.mvEval M (Core.Logic.ThreeValuedLogic.PropFormula.atom a) = M a
- Core.Logic.ThreeValuedLogic.mvEval M φ.neg = (Core.Logic.ThreeValuedLogic.mvEval M φ).neg
- Core.Logic.ThreeValuedLogic.mvEval M (φ.conj ψ) = (Core.Logic.ThreeValuedLogic.mvEval M φ).meet (Core.Logic.ThreeValuedLogic.mvEval M ψ)
Instances For
LP-satisfaction: a formula is LP-satisfied iff its three-valued evaluation is designated (non-false).
Equations
Instances For
K3-satisfaction: a formula is K3-satisfied iff its three-valued evaluation is true.
Equations
Instances For
LP/K3 duality lifts to formulas: LP-sat(¬φ) ↔ ¬K3-sat(φ).
K3-sat(¬φ) ↔ ¬LP-sat(φ).
LP-consequence: preservation of LP-designation (nonzero value) from premises to conclusion.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
K3-consequence: preservation of value 1 from premises to conclusion.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
No K3 tautologies. In the all-indeterminate model, every
formula evaluates to indet, so no formula is K3-valid.
Theorem 2 of @cite{cobreros-etal-2012}: no formula in the restricted vocabulary is s-valid.
Every formula is LP-satisfiable. The all-indeterminate model
LP-satisfies everything (since indet ≠ false).
Theorem 2 of @cite{cobreros-etal-2012}: every formula in the restricted vocabulary is t-satisfiable.