Documentation

Linglib.Core.Lexical.PolarityItem

Polarity Item Infrastructure #

@cite{lahiri-1998} @cite{lee-horn-1994} @cite{haspelmath-1997} @cite{chierchia-2006} @cite{israel-1996} @cite{israel-2001} @cite{israel-2011} @cite{schwab-2022}

Language-neutral types for polarity-sensitive items, shared across all language fragments. These capture cross-linguistic generalizations about polarity types, licensing contexts, scalar direction, scalar value, canonicity, likelihood effect, morphological composition, and alternative types.

The Scalar Model of Polarity (@cite{israel-1996}, @cite{israel-2001}) #

Polarity items are characterized by two orthogonal scalar features:

These interact with LikelihoodEffect — whether the item's referent facilitates or impedes the event — to predict Canonicity (canonical vs inverted). See Phenomena/Polarity/Studies/Israel2001.lean.

Contexts that can license polarity-sensitive items.

These are characterized by their logical properties:

  • DE (Downward Entailing): Reverses entailment direction
  • Anti-additive: DE + distributes over disjunction
  • Anti-morphic: Anti-additive + distributes over conjunction (= negation)
Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Where the polarity item sits on its scale, relative to the scalar norm.

      @cite{israel-2001}: polarity items conventionally encode a fixed position on a scalar ordering. Emphatic NPIs typically denote LOW values (a wink, an inch), while emphatic PPIs typically denote HIGH values (tons, utterly). Inverted items reverse this pattern.

      Instances For
        Equations
        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
        Instances For

          Rhetorical force: does this item strengthen or attenuate the assertion? Orthogonal to both PolarityType and ScalarValue.

          • Strengthening items (ever, any, jemals) make the assertion stronger than its scalar alternatives (@cite{israel-2001}'s "emphatic" items).
          • Attenuating items (all that, so recht, long) make the assertion weaker than its scalar alternatives (@cite{israel-2001}'s "understating" items).
          • NonScalar items (lift a finger) are idiomatic, not scalar.

          @cite{israel-1996}. Polarity sensitivity as lexical semantics. L&P 19(6). @cite{israel-2011}. The Grammar of Polarity. CUP. @cite{schwab-2022}. Lexical variation in NPI illusions.

          Instances For
            Equations
            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
            Instances For

              Whether a polarity item is canonical or inverted.

              Canonical items have the expected correlation between scalar value and polarity type:

              • Canonical emphatic NPIs denote LOW values (a wink, an inch)
              • Canonical emphatic PPIs denote HIGH values (tons, utterly)

              Inverted items reverse this:

              • Inverted emphatic NPIs denote HIGH values (wild horses, all the tea in China)
              • Inverted emphatic PPIs denote LOW values (at the drop of a hat, for a pittance)

              @cite{israel-2001} §3–4 shows inversion tracks propositional role: canonical items fill impeding roles (patient/theme); inverted items fill facilitating roles (stimulus/instrument/reward).

              Instances For
                Equations
                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                Instances For

                  How increasing the scalar value of an item's referent affects the likelihood of the proposition being true.

                  This is the key to @cite{israel-2001}'s resolution of the maximizer/minimizer puzzle:

                  • Facilitating roles (agent, stimulus, instrument, reward): bigger/more → event more likely → scale is inverted (e.g., wild horses — more powerful force → more likely to move you)

                  • Impeding roles (patient, theme, increment, resource/expense): bigger/more → event less likely → scale is canonical (e.g., lift a finger — more effort required → less likely to act)

                  The pecuniary paradox dissolves: a red cent (NPI, resource = impeding) vs for peanuts (PPI, reward = facilitating) — same monetary domain, different propositional roles.

                  Instances For
                    Equations
                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                    Instances For

                      Type of polarity sensitivity.

                      Instances For
                        Equations
                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                        Instances For

                          Base quantificational force (when interpretable).

                          Instances For
                            Equations
                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                            Instances For

                              Morphological composition of a polarity-sensitive item. @cite{lahiri-1998} shows Hindi NPIs are transparently indefinite + even. @cite{lee-horn-1994} document this pattern cross-linguistically.

                              Instances For
                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  Type of alternatives introduced by the focused element. @cite{lahiri-1998} §8: ek bhii introduces cardinality alternatives, koii bhii introduces contextually salient property alternatives. @cite{chierchia-2006}: subdomain (D-)alternatives for domain widening.

                                  Instances For
                                    Equations
                                    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                    Instances For

                                      A lexical entry for a polarity-sensitive item.

                                      Theory-neutral: captures distributional facts without committing to a particular analysis (exhaustification, domain widening, etc.).

                                      • form : String

                                        Surface form

                                      • polarityType : PolarityType

                                        Type of polarity sensitivity

                                      • baseForce : BaseForce

                                        Base quantificational/semantic force

                                      • licensingContexts : List LicensingContext

                                        Contexts where licensed (empty = needs positive)

                                      • scalarDirection : ScalarDirection

                                        Scalar direction: strengthening, attenuating, or non-scalar

                                      • scalarValue : ScalarValue

                                        Scalar value: high or low on the relevant scale (@cite{israel-2001})

                                      • canonicity : Canonicity

                                        Canonical or inverted (@cite{israel-2001} §3)

                                      • likelihoodEffect : LikelihoodEffect

                                        Propositional role's likelihood effect (@cite{israel-2001} §4)

                                      • morphology : NPIMorphology

                                        Morphological composition (@cite{lahiri-1998})

                                      • alternativeType : AlternativeType

                                        Type of alternatives introduced

                                      • notes : String

                                        Notes

                                      Instances For
                                        Equations
                                        • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                        Instances For

                                          Check if a context licenses a polarity item.

                                          An item is licensed if the context is explicitly listed in licensingContexts.

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            Check if an item is an NPI (weak or strong).

                                            Equations
                                            • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                            Instances For

                                              Israel's prediction (@cite{israel-2001} §4): canonical/inverted is determined solely by likelihood effect (propositional role).

                                              • Impeding roles → canonical items
                                              • Facilitating roles → inverted items

                                              This holds for both NPIs and PPIs, regardless of scalar value. Scalar value determines WHERE on the scale an item sits; likelihood effect determines WHETHER the item is canonical or inverted.

                                              Equations
                                              Instances For

                                                Check if a polarity item's stated canonicity agrees with the prediction. Returns true if canonicity or likelihood effect is unknown (insufficient data), or if the stated canonicity matches the prediction from likelihood effect.

                                                Equations
                                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                                Instances For