Documentation

Linglib.Core.Interfaces.CombinationSchemata

Combination Schema #

Theory-neutral interface for @cite{mueller-2013}'s three universal combination schemata.

All syntactic theories (Minimalism, HPSG, CCG, CxG, DG) converge on three fundamental modes of combination:

SchemaMinimalismHPSGCCGDG
Head-ComplementExt Merge (1st)Head-Compfapp/bappobj/det/... dep
Head-SpecifierExt Merge (later)Head-SubjT+bappsubj dep
Head-FillerInt MergeHead-Fillerfcomp/bcompnon-proj dep

Müller's three universal combination schemata (§2).

Every syntactic theory implements these three modes of combination, though they use different terminology and formalisms.

  • headComplement : CombinationKind

    Head combines with its complement (first-merged argument). Minimalism: External Merge (first); HPSG: Head-Complement Schema; CCG: forward/backward application; DG: core dependency (obj, det,...).

  • headSpecifier : CombinationKind

    Head combines with its specifier (later-merged argument). Minimalism: External Merge (later); HPSG: Head-Subject Schema; CCG: type-raise + backward app; DG: subject dependency.

  • headFiller : CombinationKind

    Filler combines with a gapped structure (long-distance dependency). Minimalism: Internal Merge; HPSG: Head-Filler Schema; CCG: forward/backward composition; DG: non-projective dependency.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Core convergence: a theory provides three combination schemata.

      This is the minimal interface for Müller's convergence claim. T is a theory tag type (e.g., Minimalism, HPSG). Expr is the theory's expression type (e.g., SyntacticObject, Sign).

      • Expr : Type

        The expression type for this theory

      • classify : Expr TExpr TExpr TOption CombinationKind

        Classify a combination of head + nonHead → result as one of the three schemata

      • catOf : Expr TOption UD.UPOS

        Get the category of an expression (if available)

      Instances

        Müller's labeling claim (§2.1): the head determines the category of the result.

        This is the Head Feature Principle: in any combination, the category of the resulting phrase equals the category of the head daughter.

        Instances

          Coordination diagnostic (§2.2): same category required.

          Coordination is a diagnostic for constituency: only expressions of the same category can coordinate. This holds across all theories.

          Instances