Documentation

Linglib.Core.Discourse.ReferentialForm

Referential Form in Production #

@cite{ariel-2001} @cite{arnold-wasow-losongco-ginstrom-2000}

Speakers choose between reduced (pronoun) and full (name, description) forms when referring to discourse entities. This choice is governed by the accessibility of the referent: more accessible/predictable referents license more reduced forms (@cite{ariel-2001}).

The Accessibility Marking Scale #

The canonical referential form type is AccessibilityLevel, @cite{ariel-2001}'s 18-level ordering from least accessible (full name + modifier) to most accessible (zero/pro-drop). This replaces the earlier conflation with DefinitenessLevel — the accessibility and definiteness scales are non-monotonically related (names are less accessible than definite descriptions but more prominent for DOM), so they must be separate types. A coarsening function toDefLevel bridges to the DOM/DSM scale when needed.

This module provides the link between accessibility/predictability and referential form, connecting Phenomena/Reference/ (form choice) to Phenomena/WordOrder/ (position choice) via the shared dimension of NP weight/reduction.

@cite{ariel-2001}'s Accessibility Marking Scale: a fine-grained ordering of referential form types from least to most accessible.

Each constructor represents a class of referring expressions. Speakers use more reduced forms for more accessible referents.

Instances For
    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      Numeric rank: 0 (lowest accessibility) to 17 (highest). Higher rank = higher accessibility = more reduced form.

      Equations
      Instances For

        Coarsening: each accessibility level maps to one of the 5 DefinitenessLevel categories used for differential argument marking. This is a many-to-one, non-monotone mapping — names are less accessible than definite descriptions but more prominent for DOM.

        Equations
        Instances For
          @[reducible, inline]

          Referential form options for referring to a discourse entity. Uses @cite{ariel-2001}'s 18-level accessibility marking scale.

          Equations
          Instances For

            Next-mention bias: how likely a discourse referent is to be mentioned again in the subsequent utterance. Driven by thematic roles, coherence relations, and discourse structure.

            Instances For
              Equations
              • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
              Instances For

                Accessibility prediction: high next-mention bias licenses reduced referential form (unstressed pronoun); low bias requires full form (full name).

                This is the monotone link at the heart of @cite{ariel-2001}'s Accessibility Marking Scale: more accessible referents → more reduced forms. The same relationship underlies the Probabilistic Reduction Hypothesis (more predictable → shorter/more reduced).

                Equations
                Instances For

                  NP weight correlate: reduced referential forms are lighter. Approximate number of words in a typical instance of each form. This connects form selection to constituent ordering (heavy NP shift, DLM).

                  The same choice that makes a referent "more reduced" also makes it "lighter", linking @cite{ariel-2001}'s accessibility hierarchy to @cite{arnold-wasow-losongco-ginstrom-2000}'s heaviness effects.

                  Equations
                  Instances For