Local Case Extension Paths @cite{blake-1994} #
@cite{heine-2009}
@cite{blake-1994} documents how semantic cases — especially local cases — extend to cover grammatical functions through grammaticalization (pp. 172–175). He shows that this direction is always from spatial/concrete to grammatical/abstract: a locative marker may extend to dative function, but not vice versa.
The specific polysemy chains below are our synthesis of Blake's scattered observations, not his explicit named paths:
- Ablative (source) → instrumental (means) → causal (reason)
- Locative (place) → dative (experiencer, temporal)
- Allative (goal) → dative (recipient) → benefactive
Blake documents ABL/INST syncretism (p. 175: "Ablative-instrumental syncretism occurred in a number of Indo-European languages"), LOC→DAT extension (p. 188, note 15), and ALL→DAT overlap (p. 174: "A dative will often express destination as well"). We encode these as directed chains for computational use.
The grammatical functions that a spatial case marker can extend to cover, ordered from most concrete to most abstract.
Each path represents a cross-linguistically attested polysemy chain, synthesized from @cite{blake-1994}'s discussion of case extension.
Equations
Instances For
ABL extends to INST and CAUS.
Core grammatical cases have no extensions — they don't extend to other grammatical functions (@cite{blake-1994}, Ch. 6: extensions go from peripheral/spatial to grammatical, never the reverse).
The ABL → INST → CAUS chain is properly ordered: each step goes from more concrete to more abstract.