Documentation

Linglib.Core.Case.FeatureDecomposition

Case Feature Decomposition @cite{anderson-jm-2006} #

@cite{anderson-jm-2006} "Modern Grammars of Case" (Ch. 6) develops a localist case grammar (LCG) in which all semantic relations decompose into combinations of three first-order case features:

These features combine freely, yielding up to 8 possible argument roles. The four SIMPLE case relations are (eq. 11):

FeaturesRelationTypical role
abspatient/theme
{src}source/ergagent
{loc}locativelocation
{loc,src²}ablativespatial source

where src² denotes second-order source subordinated to loc, distinct from first-order src. Second-order features are not separately represented in this flat model — ablative appears as just loc.

Complex roles (argument-level combinations) #

Arguments can bear COMBINATIONS of first-order features (§6.2–6.3):

Subject selection hierarchy (eq. 38') #

Anderson directly states the hierarchy — it is NOT derived from feature cardinality:

erg > abs

First-order source (src) outranks absolutive. The argument with src becomes subject; if no argument has src, the absolutive becomes subject.

Subject formation (eq. 40): absolutive ⇒ absolutive{erg}. When an absolutive is selected as subject, it acquires the ergative feature — assimilatory neutralization.

Relation to Blake and Caha #

Anderson's three first-order case features (@cite{anderson-jm-2006}, Ch. 6).

The three features are the primitives from which all semantic relations are composed. Their names reflect Anderson's localist tradition.

  • abs : CaseFeature

    Absolutive: holistic participant, the affected/located entity.

  • src : CaseFeature

    Source/ergative: the origin of action or force (first-order).

  • loc : CaseFeature

    Locative: place or spatial/abstract location.

Instances For

    An argument's case specification: a bundle of first-order features (@cite{anderson-jm-2006}, Ch. 6).

    Represented as three Bools for computational tractability. The 8 possible bundles include both simple case relations (abs, erg, loc) and complex argument roles (abs+src, src+loc, abs+loc, abs+src+loc).

    Second-order features ({goal}, {source} subordinated to loc/abs) are not separately represented. In particular, ablative (loc{source}) and plain locative (loc) are both ⟨false, false, true⟩. This is an acknowledged simplification: second-order source does not participate in subject selection, so the flat representation suffices for linking.

    • abs : Bool

      Does this argument bear the absolutive feature?

    • src : Bool

      Does this argument bear the source/ergative feature (first-order)?

    • loc : Bool

      Does this argument bear the locative feature?

    Instances For
      Equations
      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
      Instances For
        Equations
        Instances For
          Equations
          • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
          Instances For

            ∅: no features. The semantically empty base.

            Equations
            Instances For

              {abs}: absolutive alone. Patient/theme — affected entity.

              Equations
              Instances For

                {src}: source/ergative. Agent — source of action.

                Equations
                Instances For

                  {loc}: locative. Place/location (also covers ablative = loc{source} in this flat representation, since second-order source is not tracked).

                  Equations
                  Instances For

                    {abs, src}: absolutive + source. Self-moving agent — both the source of action AND the affected/moving entity. "Bill flew to China" (eq. 39c).

                    Equations
                    Instances For

                      {src, loc}: source + locative. Experiencer — locative source. "Bill knew the answer" (eq. 39h). The experience is "located at" the experiencer, who is also the source of the knowing. Anderson's notation: E (= erg,loc).

                      Equations
                      Instances For

                        {abs, loc}: absolutive + locative. Contactive — the entity that is simultaneously located and holistically affected. "The ferry reached Patra" (20a); Contactive = abs,loc (eq. 22).

                        Equations
                        Instances For

                          {abs, src, loc}: all three features. Complex experiencer/sufferer. "Phil suffered from asthma" (eq. 34).

                          Equations
                          Instances For

                            The subject selection rank of a case relation on Anderson's hierarchy (eq. 38', Ch. 6).

                            Anderson DIRECTLY STATES this hierarchy — it is NOT derived from feature cardinality. The rule: first-order source (src/erg) outranks absolutive. If an argument has src, it becomes subject. If no argument has src, the absolutive becomes subject.

                            • rank 2: any relation containing src (agent, experiencer, etc.)
                            • rank 1: any relation containing abs but not src (patient, theme)
                            • rank 0: locative without abs or src (pure spatial, not a subject)
                            Equations
                            Instances For

                              Source/ergative (agent) has rank 2 — highest.

                              Absolutive (patient) has rank 1.

                              Pure locative has rank 0 — not a subject candidate.

                              Agent outranks patient: erg > abs. This IS Anderson's hierarchy.

                              Experiencer (src+loc) has same rank as agent (src): both rank 2. Anderson DISTINGUISHES them (different feature bundles) but they are at the SAME tier for subject selection (both contain src).

                              Self-moving agent (abs+src) has rank 2, same as simple agent.

                              Contactive (abs+loc) has rank 1, same as simple absolutive.

                              Anderson's hierarchy (eq. 38') entails that subject selection depends ONLY on the src feature — loc has no effect on subjectRank. This captures his direct statement: "erg > abs".

                              theorem Core.abs_without_src_rank (cr : CaseRelation) (h1 : cr.src = false) (h2 : cr.abs = true) :

                              Absence of src with abs yields rank 1.

                              Does inner have a subset of outer's features?

                              Equations
                              Instances For

                                {abs, src, loc} contains every case relation.

                                ∅ is contained in every case relation.

                                All 8 case relations, ordered by subject rank (highest first).

                                Equations
                                • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                Instances For

                                  Membership check for decidable enumeration.

                                  Equations
                                  Instances For

                                    Every case relation is in the enumeration.

                                    structure Core.Scenario :

                                    A predicate's scenario (@cite{anderson-jm-2006}, Ch. 6): the case relations assigned to its arguments, listed with the subject first (highest subjectRank), then the object.

                                    Eq. 39 shows Anderson's derivations for six English verb types:

                                    • "Bill read the book": [erg, abs] — agent + patient
                                    • "Bill fell to the ground": [abs, loc] — theme + locative goal
                                    • "Bill flew to China": [srcAbs, loc] — self-mover + goal
                                    • "Bill knew the answer": [srcLoc, abs] — experiencer + stimulus
                                    • "Bill ran": [erg] — unergative agent
                                    Instances For
                                      Equations
                                      • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
                                      Instances For

                                        Number of arguments in the scenario.

                                        Equations
                                        Instances For

                                          Case relation of the subject (highest-ranked argument).

                                          Equations
                                          Instances For

                                            Case relation of the direct object (second argument).

                                            Equations
                                            Instances For

                                              "Bill read the book" (eq. 39a): erg + abs. Agent (src) acts on patient (abs). Agent is subject: src > abs.

                                              Equations
                                              Instances For

                                                "Bill ran" (unergative): erg alone. Agent only, no patient.

                                                Equations
                                                Instances For

                                                  "Bill fell to the ground" (eq. 39b): abs + loc{goal}. Theme (abs) moves to locative goal. No src, so abs is subject.

                                                  Equations
                                                  Instances For

                                                    "Bill flew to China" (eq. 39c): abs,erg + loc{goal}. Self-moving agent (abs+src) travels to goal. Has src → subject.

                                                    Equations
                                                    Instances For

                                                      "Bill knew the answer" (eq. 39h): E + abs = erg,loc + abs. Experiencer (src+loc) knows stimulus (abs). Has src → subject.

                                                      Equations
                                                      Instances For

                                                        In a transitive, the subject (erg) outranks the object (abs).

                                                        Unergative and unaccusative have different subject case relations: unergative = src (agentive), unaccusative = abs (patient-like).

                                                        Canonical mapping from Blake's morphological case inventory to Anderson's case-feature bundles (@cite{anderson-jm-2006}, Ch. 6).

                                                        NOM and ERG both map to abs+src: subject formation (eq. 40) means all subjects acquire the src feature, so nominative = abs{erg}. ACC and ABS map to abs (goal-absolutive for ACC, plain abs for ABS).

                                                        Peripheral spatial cases: ABL → loc (second-order source not tracked), LOC → loc, INST → src (source of force).

                                                        Equations
                                                        Instances For

                                                          NOM and ERG map to the same case relation: abs+src.

                                                          ACC and ABS map to the same case relation: abs.