<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Causation on lingliblog</title><link>https://hawkrobe.github.io/linglib/tags/causation/</link><description>Recent content in Causation on lingliblog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.159.0</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hawkrobe.github.io/linglib/tags/causation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Psych Verbs Need a Mind: Compositional Denotations via Cognitive Situation Models</title><link>https://hawkrobe.github.io/linglib/posts/2026-02-27-psych-verbs/</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://hawkrobe.github.io/linglib/posts/2026-02-27-psych-verbs/</guid><description>Psych verbs like frighten and concern differ in opacity, temporal structure, and causation — but nobody has derived these differences from a single compositional denotation grounded in cognitive architecture. We do, and opacity falls out by computation.</description></item></channel></rss>